|
|
|
  |
|
|
New Federal Health Claims Appeals Laws
&
Regulations
for 193 Million Americans
Effective 09-23-2010
©2010, Jin
Zhou, ERISAclaim.com |
|
 |
 |
|
President
Obama Signing Health Bill on
03/23/2010
|
President
Gerald R. Ford Signing ERISA on 09/02/1974 |
|
New Webinars,
Seminars & Certification Classes Announced for New Federal Health
Claim Appeals Regulations on July 22, 2010 from HHS, DOL & IRS,
Effective On Sept. 23, 2010 for 193 Million Americans |
|
 |
 |
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
(Links to DOL)
©2010, Jin Zhou, ERISAclaim.com |
|
Statutory Laws [PDF]
[PDF]
|
|
Employee Retirement Income Security Act — ERISA |
|
|
|
Webinars,
Seminars & Certification Classes for New Federal Health Claim Appeals
Regulations
ERISAclaim.com -
Free Webinar - Reimbursement Laws for Healthcare Providers & Health
Plans
ERISAclaim.com: Seminars - 2010 Two-day
Basic ERISA Appeal Seminars - Denials and Overpayment Appeals
ERISAclaim.com - 2010 ERISA Claim
Specialist Certification Programs in Chicago, Illinois
ERISAclaim.com: Create An Appeal
Department for Your Hospital or Practice
(In-house, onsite ERISA Claim Specialist Certification Programs)
|
Webinars for New
Federal Appeals Laws on New EOB’s For Claims Denials, Internal And
External Appeals Released On August 24, 2010 from IRS, DOL and HHS
08/26/2010 Hanover Park, IL
New Protections for
Out-of-Network Providers Under New Federal Health Laws and Regulations
– Free Webinars Announced from ERISAclaim.com
08/17/2010 Hanover Park, IL
Breaking News: Court Watch - ERISA Completely Pre-empts BCBSRI
Overpayment PPO Claims and Fraud Claims and ERISA Limits Blue Cross'
Potential Recovery
BCBSRI v. JAY S. KORSEN and IAN
D. BARLOW
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
10/27/10
[page 16-17 of 19]
"In the case before the bench, Blue
Cross, as a fiduciary, can make its claim under § 502(a) (3), which
permits a participant, beneficiary or fiduciary of an ERISA plan to
bring a civil action "(A) to enjoin any act or practice which violates
any provision of this subchapter or the terms of the plan, or (B) to
obtain other appropriate equitable relief ... " 29 U.S.C. §1132(a)
(3). The Court holds further that there is no independent legal duty
controlling Defendants' conduct herein; because, while the Provider
Agreements do impose duties on Defendants, these duties are not
independent of the terms of the ERISA plans.
Consequently, the Court holds
that Blue Cross' Count I for breach of contract, alleging that
Defendants breached the Provider Agreements by submitting claims using
improper CPT codes and submitting claims for services that were
inappropriate or not medically necessary, and Count II for fraud
are completely preempted by ERISA.
The Court converts these claims to a federal ERISA § 502 (a) (3)
claim.
As part of Count I, Blue Cross also alleges that Defendant Korsen
breached the Provider Agreement by terminating the Provider Agreement
without providing 60 days notice. This portion of the state-law breach
of contract claim is not subject to ERISA's complete preemption and
thus is unaffected by the Court's decision today.
Though the Court's ruling limits Blue
Cross' potential recovery, this holding is consistent with the
legislative aims identified by the Supreme Court in Davila:
"The limited remedies available under ERISA are an inherent part of
the 'careful balancing' between ensuring fair and prompt enforcement
of rights under a plan and the encouragement of the creation of such
plans." 542 U.S. at 215 (quoting pilot Life Ins. Co. v. Dedeaux, 481
U.S. 41, 55 (1987). Moreover, the Congressional objectives of
consistency in regulation and uniform administration of ERISA plans
are met.
Congress' intent to make the ERISA civil
enforcement mechanism exclusive would be undermined if state causes of
action that supplement the ERISA § 502(a) remedies were permitted,
even if the elements of the state cause of action did not precisely
duplicate the elements of an ERISA claim."
Court Watch:
UnitedHealthcare Sued In ERISA Class Action Over Its Overpayment
Recoupment Practice
© Jin Zhou, President, ERISAcalim.com
08/06/2010
"Hanover Park, IL (ERISAclaim.com)
August 06, 2010 - UNITED HEALTHCARE
was sued in ERISA class action counterclaims on July 21, 2010 in
United States District Court, Southern District of New York, for the
alleged ERISA violations in its overpayment practice by patients and
providers.
This is the third provider ERISA class
action lawsuit against Insurers since
Aetna was sued
in last July and
21 BCBS Entities
in last Sept in federal courts over payer’s overpayment recoupment
practice, after a
federal court ruled in Chicago on BCBS
case allowing provider’s ERISA class action claim to proceed,
said Dr. Zhou.
" (Read
more......)
ERISAclaim.com - Health
Reform for Out-Of-Network Providers:
Receiving Insurance
Checks Directly? – CD Books & Seminars on Why & How 04-05-2010
Federal Court Ruling On Provider Class Action
MD Edgar Borrero v. United Healthcare of
New York
http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/200815264.pdf
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
<<http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/200815264.pdf>>
July 6, 2010
“Consistent with Connecticut
State Dental, at least some of the claims pursued by the Appellants
implicate legal duties dependent on the interpretation of an ERISA
plan. These claims—about wrongfully denied benefits based on
determinations of medical necessity—relate directly to the coverage
afforded by the ERISA plans. Many of the other allegations in the
complaint, for practices like downcoding and bundling, are based on
independent provider-insurer contracts and do not implicate ERISA.
But, because at least some of the allegations are dependent on ERISA,
those claims are completely preempted and federal question
jurisdiction exists. Because Appellants’ claims are completely
preempted by ERISA, a federal court has subject matter jurisdiction
over Appellants’ suit.” (Emphasis added)
|
03/23/2010
Breaking News
President Obama Signed Into the Law the Healthcare
Legislation to Revamp Healthcare Reimbursement Laws for All Group Health
Plans and Health Care Providers
The Final Health Reform Bill Has Been
Signed By President Obama Into The Law Of The Land For More Than 95%
Americans, As The Most Significant Changes Since Medicare Was Created 45
Years Ago. What Does Obama Healthcare Law Mean To Healthcare Providers
And Health Plans? The New Federal Reimbursement Laws Protect Health Care
Providers with ERISA Internal And External Appeals, Extended Disclosure
And Appeal Rights, New Federal UCR Fee Centers And New Federal
Simplified, Uniform Standards For Claim Processing And Appeals. The New
Federal Reimbursement Laws Will Eventually Eliminate Most Managed care
Abuses
|
|
|
Breaking News
from Federal Court
On
Overpayment Crisis
Insurance News - Pomerantz Haudek Grossman & Gross LLP
Announces That Court Permits Provider ERISA Class Action to
Proceed Against Blue Cross Blue Shield Companies for Improper
Overpayment Demands and Forced Recoupment
Pomerantz
Haudek Grossman & Gross LLP Announces That Court Permits Provider
ERISA Class Action to Proceed Against Blue Cross Blue Shield
Companies for Improper Overpayment Demands and Forced Recoupment
"NEW
YORK, May 25, 2010 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Pomerantz Haudek Grossman &
Gross LLP (the "Pomerantz Firm") today announced that the United
States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois upheld
claims filed under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of
1974 ("ERISA") against 22 leading Blue Cross Blue Shield ("BCBS")
insurers across the country. The action was filed on behalf of a
putative nationwide class of health care providers, as well as the
Pennsylvania Chiropractic Association ("PCA"), the New York
Chiropractic Council (the "Council"), the Association of New
Jersey Chiropractors ("ANJC"), the Florida Chiropractic
Association ("FCA"), and the California Chiropractic Association
("CCA"). The suit challenges the Defendants' abusive practices in
using post-payment audits and reviews, and improper repayment
demands, to pressure providers to repay substantial sums that have
previously properly been paid as health insurance benefits for
services provided to BCBS subscribers......
"This
is a landmark decision, with widespread implications for the
health care industry," says Jin Zhou, D.C. "Providers finally have
a means to fight back against insurance companies for making
invalid overpayment demands." Dr. Zhou is a national ERISA
consultant who, through his website, www.ERISAclaim.com, and
consulting services he offers to providers and plan sponsors, has
long advocated the use of ERISA to combat improper post-payment
audit activities.
"
For a Copy
of the Court Ruling
PA Chiro Assnt et al v. BCBSA et al
May 17, 2010
PORTER v. ANTHEM HEALTH PLANS
OF KENTUCKY, INC.
March 18, 2010
United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, Northern Division,
Ashland.
A PPO participating
provider sued the Anthem for alleged wrongful overpayment
recoupment in the state court. "Defendant argues that this case
could have been brought under ERISA and is thus subject to federal
jurisdiction. The Court agrees."
The court mainly relied
upon the U.S. Supreme Court unanimous landmark decision in
Aetna
v. Davila, and ruled that PPO overpayment recoupment
dispute is 100% ERISA
business, not PPO business at all.
This is the latest and the
first federal court ruling for skyrocketing overpayment crisis in
U.S. healthcare system with a potential of $6 trillion in
overpayment dispute market. The provider class action lawsuits
under ERISA are expected
to explode in 2010.
ERISAclaim.com is the
only compliance consultant and publisher with ERISA compliant
Appeals Books and systems to effectively assist providers in appealing the alleged
overpayment demand and recoupment under ERISA:
New Free Webinars Announced to Discuss the
Latest Federal Court Overpayment Lawsuit Ruling and New Obama
Health Laws for the Skyrocketing $6 Trillion Overpayment
Recoupment Market 03-29-2010, Hanover Park, IL
The New ERISA Overpayment Appeals And
Anti-Fraud Services Announced For Healthcare Providers Through
ERISA Appeals And Anti-Fraud Compliance
02-08-2010, Hanover Park, IL
ERISAclaim.com: 2010 Appeal
Books & Systems for Maximal Reimbursement by Compliance
|
|
PORTER v. ANTHEM HEALTH PLANS
OF KENTUCKY, INC.
March 18, 2010
United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, Northern Division,
Ashland.
"In addition,
Plaintiffs' claim sounds in ERISA.
Absent ERISA, there
would be no obligation between the parties. Of note in
this regard is United
States Supreme Court decision in which participants in an
ERISA plan sued the plan administrators in tort, alleging injury
arising from the administrators' decisions to deny coverage for
certain treatments. Aetna Health, Inc.
v. Davilla, 542 U.S. 200 (2004). The Supreme Court
rejected the Plaintiffs' argument that the action sounded in
state tort law, finding that liability only exited because of
the ERISA plans that bound the parties. Id.
As in Davilla, that Porter and
his practice have a
provider contract with Anthem does not, in and of itself, create
an independent legal duty for Anthem to make payments to Porter.
What is payable, and, more importantly, what is not is
defined by the terms of the benefit plans and, thus, governed by
ERISA."
|
Pomerantz Files Class Action Against Blue
Cross Blue Shield Association
Sept. 10, 2009
"Pomerantz filed a class
action lawsuit against the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association ("BCBSA")
and 22 leading BCBS insurers across the country on behalf of a
putative nationwide class of health care providers, as well as the
Pennsylvania Chiropractic Association ("PCA"), the New York
Chiropractic Council (the "Council"), and the Association of New
Jersey Chiropractors ("ANJC"). The suit challenges the Defendants'
abusive practices in using post-payment audits and reviews, and
improper repayment demands, to pressure providers to repay
substantial sums that have previously properly been paid as health
insurance benefits for services provided to BCBS subscribers."
For a copy of the BCBSA Complaint, click here
|
White House gives Congress two weeks to pass health-care bill
Washington Post
"White House press
secretary
Robert Gibbs is ratcheting up the pressure on Congress to complete
health-care legislation,
setting March 18 as the deadline by which a final bill should be
passed."
The New Healthcare Reform
Is Final on Provider Reimbursement Laws - ERISA Appeals
Procedures Mandatory for All Group Health Plans and Healthcare
Providers
01-04-2010, Hanover Park, IL
The Final Health Bill Passed In Senate
On Christmas Eve Is Completely Consistent With House Health Bill By
Incorporating ERISA Claim Regulation In Its Entirety For All Group
Health Plans Into Obama Health Reform, For 200 Million Americans
Under New Obama Universal Healthcare Laws. ERISA Appeal Process Is
Now Mandatory For All Group Health Plans And Healthcare Providers As
Well As Consumers. First Free Monthly ERISA Webinar starts on
01/18/2010, and First Advanced ERISA Claim Specialist Certification
Program Starts in Feb. 2010.
HR3962: Affordable Health Care for
America Act
HR3590: Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act
Guest column: Congress
should restore workers' rights (DesMoinesRegister.com)
"ERISA
eliminates remedies that used to be available if your insurer denied
you coverage in bad faith. You could sue for damages to compensate you
for the ... ….At least 18,000 people die annually because their
health insurer won't cover the treatments they need to stay alive.”
The Insurance
Companies' "License to Kill": ERISA (10/27/2009,
OpEdNews
Douglas Drenkow)
"One of the most notorious cases in
which ERISA stood in the way of justice was that of California
teenager Nataline Sarkisyan. In 2007, the 17-year-old who ..."
License to Steal?
Embezzlement Recovery Services (ERS)
for Midsized and Large ERISA Health
Plans
ERISAclaim.com Press
Release
ERISAclaim.com
Announced The Nation's First Embezzlement Recovery Services for Large
ERISA Health Plans from the $6 Trillion Healthcare Denial Management
Market 10-23-2009, Hanover Park, IL
ERISAclaim.com Announced Free ERISA Webinar for Healthcare Overpayment
Dispute and Claim Denials in Response to Increasing High Demand from
the $6 Trillion Healthcare Denial Management Market
10-19-2009, Hanover Park, IL
ERISAclaim.com Announced the Expansion of Its ERISA Litigation Support
For the Healthcare Claims In Response to Increasing High Demand from
the $6 Trillion Healthcare Denial Management Market.
10-19-2009, Hanover Park, IL
ERISAclaim.com
Announced the Nation's First Certification Program for the ERISA
Claim Appeal Specialist for Healthcare Providers and Managed-Care
Payers,
10-13-2009, Hanover Park, IL
ERISAclaim.com
Announced 2010 ERISA Seminars for Healthcare Overpayment and Claim
Denial Appeals for the $6 Trillion Healthcare Denial Management
Market.
10-14-2009, Hanover Park, IL
|
NBC 10 Breaking News:
Overpayment - FBI - Class
Action
"One of the Largest Fraud in US
History"
NBC10 Video
$412,951.93
Overpayment Recoupment |
Blue Cross sues doctor over payments
NARRAGANSETT, R.I. -- Just two
days after a Narragansett doctor leveled strong accusations
against Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Rhode Island, he learned he
was being sued. Blue Cross filed a $100,000 lawsuit against Dr.
Jay Korsen for damages caused by his going public with his
complaints. - turnto10.com -
Jun 19, 2009
Doctor claims Blue Cross withheld payments
A local chiropractor says he
was strong armed by Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Rhode Island. The
Narrangansett doctor says Blue Cross withheld money from him and
he charges them with intimidation. -
turnto10.com -
Jun 17, 2009
Pomerantz Files Class Action Against Blue
Cross Blue Shield Association
Sept. 10, 2009
"Pomerantz filed a class
action lawsuit against the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association ("BCBSA")
and 22 leading BCBS insurers across the country on behalf of a
putative nationwide class of health care providers, as well as the
Pennsylvania Chiropractic Association ("PCA"), the New York
Chiropractic Council (the "Council"), and the Association of New
Jersey Chiropractors ("ANJC"). The suit challenges the Defendants'
abusive practices in using post-payment audits and reviews, and
improper repayment demands, to pressure providers to repay
substantial sums that have previously properly been paid as health
insurance benefits for services provided to BCBS subscribers."
For a copy
of the BCBSA Complaint, click here
|
|
Pomerantz Files Class Action Against
Blue Cross Blue Shield Association ("BCBSA") and Related BCBSA
Entities
Reuters, Thu Sep 10, 2009 6:11pm EDT
CHICAGO--(Business Wire)--
"Pomerantz Haudek Grossman & Gross LLP today
announced that it and co-counsel Buttaci & Leardi, LLC filed a
class action lawsuit against the Blue Cross Blue Shield
Association ("BCBSA") and 22 leading BCBS insurers across the
country on behalf of a putative nationwide class of health care
providers, as well as the Pennsylvania Chiropractic Association ("PCA"),
the New York Chiropractic Council (the "Council"), and the
Association of New Jersey Chiropractors ("ANJC"). The suit
challenges the Defendants` abusive practices in using post-payment
audits and reviews, and improper repayment demands, to pressure
providers to repay substantial sums that have previously properly
been paid as health insurance benefits for services provided to
BCBS subscribers.
......In making the appointment, the Court
stressed the significant role Pomerantz had played in a $249
million settlement of its UCR class action against Health Net,
stating that the Court had "similarly appointed Pomerantz to be
Plaintiffs` spokesman to the Court in the Health Net litigation
because the Court found D. Brian Hufford, Esq. to be the attorney
most capable of presenting Plaintiffs` position in a clear and
concise manner." In re Aetna UCR Litig., 2009 Dist. LEXIS 66853,
*8 n.4 (D.N.J. July 31, 2009)."
For a copy
of the BCBSA Complaint, click here
Pomerantz Files Class Action
Against Aetna (News
from Pomerantz)
For
a Copy of the Official Complaint, click here
Pomerantz
Files Class Action Suit Against Aetna On Behalf of Healthcare
Providers to Challenge Abusive Post-Payment Audit Practices
(GlobeNewsWire,
press release)
"NEWARK, N.J., July
29, 2009 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Pomerantz Haudek Grossman & Gross LLP
today announced that it and co-counsel Buttaci & Leardi, LLC, have
filed a class action lawsuit against Aetna, Inc., and its various
health insurance subsidiaries on behalf of a putative nationwide
class of health care providers, the Association of New Jersey
Chiropractors ("ANJC") and the New York Chiropractic Council ("NYCC").
The suit challenges Aetna's abusive practices in using post-payment
audits, with false allegations of fraud, to pressure providers to
repay substantial sums that have previously properly been paid for
providing services to Aetna subscribers.
The action alleges that Aetna's post-payment audit process violates
the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"),
in that its repayment demands are retroactive determinations that
particular services are not covered under the terms of Aetna's
health care plans, but without any of the appeal or other
protections otherwise available under ERISA for both
self-funded and fully insured health care plans offered through
private employers. The complaint further alleges that both the
post-payment audit process and the pre-payment claim review process
employed by Aetna to strong-arm chiropractors into unfavorable
settlements violate the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt
Organizations Act ("RICO"). In addition to challenging the
process by which Aetna pursues and applies its audits, the complaint
also challenges numerous clinical policy bulletins of Aetna, which
are used to deny services retroactively without adequate basis or
clinical support."
ERISAclaim.com - "Overpayment" Refund Request
Response & Appeals
BCBSA News,
June 30, 2009
Blue Cross And Blue Shield Companies'
Anti-Fraud Efforts Recover
$350 Million In 2008
"WASHINGTON
– Blue Cross and Blue Shield companies' anti-fraud
investigations resulted in overall savings and recoveries of
nearly $350 million in
2008, an increase of
43 percent from
2007, according to data released today by the Blue Cross and Blue
Shield Association (BCBSA) National Anti-fraud Department (NAFD).
From 2007 to 2008, the number of cases opened increased
nearly 34 percent,
and the closed cases increased about
43 percent."
AMNews: July 6, 2009. Tennessee Medical Assn.
sues collections firm
Health Research Insights has contacted
physicians in several states this year trying to collect alleged
overpayments.
For A Copy of TMA v. HRI
Lawsuit, click here
AMNews: May 18, 2009. State medical societies
strategize against collector
Legal action is one option against Health
Research Insights.
AMNews: May 11, 2009. Company stops tapping
physicians for 'overpayments'
Doctors protested self-insured
Georgia-Pacific's attempt to collect refunds of suspected claims
upcoding.
AMNews: April 13, 2009. Self-insured companies
going after doctors to recover 'overpaid' claims
There is no clear time limit on how far
back ERISA-protected companies can go to
recoup money. One company is turning that into a business.
Overpayment
Demand Letter from HRI:
"Dear Health Care
Professional,
......You must take action
as outlined in items (1) or (2) above, in order to ensure compliance
with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
(ERISA). ERISA is the federal law that,
among other things, governs health benefit plans in private
industry. Investigation of potential ERISA
violations is given to the United States Secretary of Labor pursuant
to sections 504 and 506 as amended by the Comprehensive
Crime Control Act of 1984 and enforced
by the US Department of Labor.
In the event HRI is not
contacted by you or your designee, a Complaint
may be filed with the Employee Benefits Security Administration
(EBSA). You may view additional
information at
(www.dol.gov/ebsa)."
Physicians Strike Back At Employers'
Collection Firms ( BNET Healthcare Blog | BNET)
"In the most
recent clash,
the Tennessee Medical
Association has sued
Health Research Insights (HRI), a Franklin,
TN-based firm that has sent collection letters to physicians in
Georgia, Kentucky, Tennessee and Texas.
Other defendants in the
suit include the Metropolitan Government of Nashville
and Davidson County, TN, and Nashville’s
Board of Education, which runs a self-insured
plan for school employees. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of
Tennessee, the plan’s administrator, is also named
in the suit, although the insurer disavows any relationship with
the collection firm.
The suit, which alleges
fraud, says that HRI keeps 40 percent of whatever it collects.
The TMA wants a court to enjoin HRI from making any further
efforts to collect from physicians. An earlier protest by the
Georgia Medical Society against HRI’s work on
behalf of Georgia Pacific led to a suspension of
those activities."
Employment-Based Health Coverage and
Health Reform: Selected Legal Considerations (PDF)
(U.S. Congressional Research Service)
"It is estimated that
nearly 170 million individuals have employer-based health
coverage. As part of a comprehensive health care reform
effort, there has been support (including from the Obama
Administration) in enacting comprehensive health insurance reform
that retains the employerbased system. This report presents
selected legal considerations inherent in amending two of the
primary federal laws governing employer-sponsored health care:
the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act (ERISA) and the Internal Revenue Code
(IRC)."
ERISAclaim.com - "Overpayment" Refund Request
Response & Appeals
|
04/18/2009:
ERISAClaim.com - Overpayment & SIU in 2009, $1
Trillion Healthcare Bailout & Foreclosures
"Hospitals and health-care providers have
been in
$1 trillion foreclosure in 2009 as healthcare industry bailout
by SIU ( Special Investigation Unit) from every healthcare plan payors,
managed-care network operators and even Medicare (RAC, Recovery
Auditing Contractor). This kind of sophisticated healthcare provider
foreclosure has been carried out, politically correctly, as anti-fraud
or abuse prevention program, while more than 95% of
$1 trillion
overpayment "takeback" or recoupment are truly retrospective benefits
denials."
The White House News: New ERISA Chief for USA:
"Phyllis C. Borzi, Nominee for Assistant Secretary of Labor
for Employee Benefits Security, Department of Labor"
Excerpt: "Until January 1995, [Phyllis] Borzi served as pension and employee
benefit counsel for the U.S. House of Representatives, Subcommittee on
Labor-Management Relations of the Committee on Education and Labor. She was
on the Committee staff for 16 years. . . . . Borzi has published numerous
articles on ERISA, health care law and policy and retirement security issues
and is a frequent speaker on programs sponsored by legal, professional,
business, consumer and state and local governmental organizations. An active
member of the American Bar Association, Borzi is the current chair of the
ABA's Joint Committee on Employee Benefits . . . ."
Excerpt: "President Obama on Tuesday during a
prime-time news conference linked issues within the U.S. budget in
part to high health care costs, stating that 'almost every single
person' who has examined the nation's budget has concluded that the
government must find a way to reduce health care costs, the Washington
Post reports (Shear/Wilson, Washington Post, 3/25)."
Comments from Jin Zhou:
Fixing healthcare without addressing ERISA,
the law 100% governing more than 90% of non-Medicare claims in USA, is
Impossible - Jin Zhou
ERISA laws will be definitely enforced by this new ERISA Chief.....
ERISA appeals and practice will mean more than ever before....
New 2009 ERISA Ruling from
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
KENNEDY, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF KENNEDY,
DECEASED v. PLAN ADMINISTRATOR FOR DUPONT
SAVINGS AND INVESTMENT PLAN ET AL.
For more info
http://www.erisaclaim.com/Suprem_Court.htm
Breaking News
in 2009 for Healthcare Reimbursement
© JIN ZHOU, President,
ERISAclaim.com
Jan. 13, 2009
on January 13, 2009,
Attorney General Cuomo
Announces Historic Nationwide Health Insurance Reform; Ends Practice Of
Manipulating Rates To Overcharge Patients By Hundreds Of Millions Of Dollars.
The industry wide UCR scam is the biggest consumer fraud of the Century with
conflict of interest
on January 8, 2009,
California Supreme Court ruled that
healthcare provide must appeal claim denials on UCR to HMO, health plans,
under ERISA for ERISA regulated employer-sponsored plans. health-care
providers may not balance bill HMO patient. HMOs may not simply reimburse
healthcare providers at the Medicare rate.
More than 80% of non-Medicare claims
in USA are ERISA claims, and "Seventy percent of insured working Americans
pay higher premiums for insurance plans that allow them to use
out-of-network doctors."
In the worst economic crisis for 2009,
healthcare providers must learn and do ERISA and Medicare claim appeals, or
be out of business.
NY AG's Settlement Press Release and California Supreme
Court Ruling are captioned below with color-coded notation.
If you have any questions, please contact Dr. Jin Zhou,
the president of the ERISAclaim.com at
ERISAclaim@aol.com.
|

 |
01/13/2009
Attorney General Cuomo Announces
Historic Nationwide Health Insurance Reform; Ends Practice Of Manipulating
Rates To Overcharge Patients By Hundreds Of Millions Of Dollars
Industry-Wide Reform of
Reimbursement System Will End Conflicts of Interest and Create Fair
Rates for Consumers Nationwide
NEW YORK, NY
(January 13, 2009) – Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo today
announced historic reform of the nationwide health care
reimbursement system that will end conflicts of interest and
generate fair reimbursement rates for working families nationwide.
Cuomo has reached an agreement with UnitedHealth Group Inc. (NYSE:
UNH) (“United”), the nation’s second largest health insurer, after
conducting an industry-wide investigation into
a scheme to defraud consumers by manipulating reimbursement rates.
At the center of the
scheme is Ingenix, Inc. (“Ingenix”), a
wholly-owned subsidiary of United, which is the nation’s largest
provider of health care billing information. Under the agreement
with United, the database of billing information operated by Ingenix
will close. United will pay $50 million
to a qualified nonprofit organization that will establish a new,
independent database to help determine fair out-of-network
reimbursement rates for consumers throughout the United States.
“For
the past ten years, American patients have suffered from
unfair reimbursements for critical medical
services due to a conflict-ridden system that has been owned,
operated, and manipulated by the health insurance industry.
This agreement marks the end of that flawed system,” said Attorney
General Cuomo. “As working families throughout our nation struggle
with the burden of health care costs, we will make sure that health
insurers keep their promise to pay their fair share. The industry
reforms that we announce today will bring crucial accuracy,
transparency, and independence to a broken system.
During these tough economic times, this
agreement will keep hundreds of millions of dollars in the pockets
of over one hundred million Americans.”
In February 2008,
the Attorney General announced an industry-wide investigation into
allegations that health insurers unfairly saddle consumers with too
much of the cost of out-of-network health care.
Seventy percent of insured working Americans pay higher premiums
for insurance plans that allow them to use
out-of-network doctors. In
exchange, insurers often promise to cover up to eighty percent
of the “usual and customary” rate of the
out-of-network expenses, and consumers are responsible for
paying the balance of the bill.
United and the
largest health insurers in the country rely on the United-owned
Ingenix database to determine their “usual and
customary” rates. The Ingenix database uses the insurers’
billing information to calculate “usual and
customary” rates for individual claims by assessing how much
the same, or similar, medical services would typically cost,
generally taking into account the type of service and geographical
location. Under this system, insurers control reimbursement rates
that are supposed to fairly reflect the market.
Attorney General
Cuomo’s investigation concerned allegations that the Ingenix
database intentionally skewed “usual and
customary” rates downward through faulty data collection,
poor pooling procedures, and the lack of audits.
That means many consumers were forced to pay
more than they should have. The investigation
found the rate of underpayment by insurers
ranged from ten to twenty-eight percent for various medical services
across the state. The Attorney General found that
having a health insurer determine the “usual
and customary” rate – a large portion of which the insurer then
reimburses – creates an incentive for the insurer to manipulate the
rate downward. The creation of a new database, independently
maintained by a nonprofit organization, is designed to remove this
conflict of interest.
Under Attorney General Cuomo’s
agreement with United:
- United will pay
$50 million to establish a new,
independent database run by a qualified nonprofit organization;
- The
nonprofit will own and operate the new database, and will
be the sole arbiter and decision-maker with respect to all data
contribution protocols and all other methodologies used in
connection with the database;
- The
nonprofit will develop a website where, for the first time,
consumers around the country can find out in
advance how much they may be reimbursed for common out-of-network
medical services in their area;
- The nonprofit will make rate
information from the database available to
health insurers;
- The
nonprofit will use the new database to conduct academic
research to help improve the health care system;
- The nonprofit will be selected
and announced at a future date.
In February 2008,
Cuomo also announced that he had issued subpoenas to the nation’s
largest health insurance companies that use the Ingenix database,
including Aetna (NYSE: AET), CIGNA (NYSE: CI),
and WellPoint/Empire BlueCross BlueShield (NYSE: WLP). The Attorney
General’s industry-wide investigation is ongoing.
Cuomo continued,
“Our agreement with United removes the
conflicts of interest that have been inherent in the consumer
reimbursement system. This has been an industry-wide problem, and
it demands an industry-wide reform. We commend United for leading
the industry on this issue, and we encourage
other insurers to follow suit.”
Cuomo was joined by
representatives from United and from leading medical and consumer
organizations in making today’s announcement at the Saint Vincent
Catholic Medical Center in Manhattan.
“We are committed to
increasing the amount of useful information available in the health
care marketplace so that people can make informed decisions, and
this agreement is consistent with that approach and philosophy,”
said Thomas L. Strickland, Executive Vice President and Chief Legal
Officer of UnitedHealth Group. “We are pleased that a
not-for-profit entity will play this important role for the
marketplace.”
President of the American Medical Association
(AMA), Nancy Nielsen, M.D., said, “Today, patients and
physicians prevailed over health insurance giant UnitedHealth Group
when New York Attorney General Cuomo stopped the insurer from using
a rigged Ingenix database that increased insurer profits at the
expense of patients and physicians. The AMA appreciates the
leadership of Attorney General Cuomo in initiating his investigation
into the Ingenix database, and fully supports the Attorney General’s
actions to have a nonprofit entity create a new, reliable database
that is fair to patients and physicians.”
President of the
Medical Society of the State of New York (MSSNY) Michael H.
Rosenberg, M.D., said, “We thank Attorney General Cuomo for taking
decisive action to finally achieve one of the major goals of a
lawsuit that the Medical Society of the State of New York initiated
with two other medical societies over eight years ago. Because of
the thorough research and diligent negotiation of Mr. Cuomo and his
expert staff, patients and their physicians will no longer be
subject to inadequate out-of-network payments determined by the
flawed Ingenix database.”
Consumers Union
Programs Director Chuck Bell said, “Consumers
Union greatly appreciates the care that Attorney General
Cuomo and his staff have taken in investigating these issues, and
creating the careful architecture in this settlement. This is an
extremely sensible, fair solution, which will be of great benefit
for consumers nationwide. We appreciate the fact that United
Healthcare has come to the table to resolve these issues in a
comprehensive way, and we hope that other insurance companies will
quickly get on board, and strongly support this excellent plan to
improve transparency for out-of-network charges.” Consumers Union
is the nonprofit publisher of Consumer Reports.
Today, Cuomo also
issued a report on his investigation, “Health Care Report: The
Consumer Reimbursement System is Code Blue.” The report highlights
the conflicts of interest and other defects in the current system
and calls for the reforms announced today. It can be accessed at
http://www.oag.state.ny.us/bureaus/health_care/HIT/reimbursement_rates.html.
The agreement
announced today is the result of an investigation by Deputy Chief of
the Health Care Bureau James E. Dering, Senior Trial Counsel Kathryn
E. Diaz, and Assistant Attorneys General Brant Campbell and Sandra
Rodriguez, under the direction of Linda A. Lacewell, the head of the
Attorney General’s Healthcare Industry Taskforce. The Attorney
General expressed his appreciation to Steven E. Fineman, Esq., of
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, for his pro bono
services in this matter.
For more
information, including consumer tips for out-of-network care, or to
file a complaint, please visit
http://www.oag.state.ny.us/bureaus/health_care/HIT/reimbursement_rates.html."
**************************
2009 UCR in the Media
Health
insurer accused of overcharging millions - Health - TODAYshow.com
“This is a huge scam
that affected hundreds of millions of Americans [who were] ripped off by
their health insurance companies,” says Cuomo. “This was unethical, and it
robbed vulnerable patients of insurance reimbursements they deserved.”
“This is huge.
This problem went across the country,” Nancy Nielsen,
president of the American Medical Association, told the TODAY show. “It’s
industry-wide, throughout insurers. So, it touched every state. Many
doctors, many millions of patients, and this has been going on for years.”
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Unions Obtain Historic Health Care
Settlement for Members and ...
MSNBC - 8 hours ago
On Tuesday, New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo
announced a settlement with United Healthcare in which a new and independent
database would be ...
Pomerantz
Announces $350 Million Settlement With United
Healthcare ...
MSNBC
© JIN ZHOU, President,
ERISAclaim.com
Jan. 16, 2009
|
|
PROSPECT MEDICAL GROUP, INC., et al. v.
NORTHRIDGE EMERGENCY MEDICAL GROUP et al.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
Filed 1/8/09
"The Court of Appeal concluded that balance
billing is not statutorily prohibited. Second, it concluded that
Prospect is not entitled to a judicial declaration
imposing the Medicare rate as the reasonable rate. Third, it
concluded the trial court abused its discretion by denying leave to amend
the complaint to permit Prospect to allege that Emergency Physicians charged
more than a reasonable rate for a specific medical procedure."
"......we conclude that billing disputes over
emergency medical care must be resolved solely
between the emergency room doctors, who are entitled to a reasonable payment
for their services, and the HMO, which is obligated to make that payment.
A patient who is a member of an HMO may not be injected into the
dispute. Emergency room doctors may not bill the patient for the disputed
amount."
2009 UCR / HMO in the
Media
The California Supreme Court on Balance Billing and Healthcare ...
© JIN ZHOU, President,
ERISAclaim.com
Jan. 13, 2009
|
|
Dr. Jin Zhou (Joe) will Speak at
The
Business of Medicare Advantage: Forum 2009
by
WRG Research Inc
Afternoon Workshop E on Junauary 28,2009
January 28 - 30, 2009,
Washington, DC
Best
Practices for Operations, Revenue Management, Policy, Marketing,
Compliance, Strategy, Part D, SNPs and Dual Eligibles
Speakers -
Agenda at
Glance -
Who should Attend --
Why attend |
|
 |
-
Dr. Jin Zhou will be speaking at World
Research Group's
"Summit on Medicare
Advantage Reimbursement for Hospitals"
-
E-mail Your Questions to
ERISAclaim@aol.com
|
New 2007 ERISA Appeal
Major Updates ($95)
ERISAclaim.com
04/06/2007
New Denial
Crisis Demanding for New Solutions
for Your
Reimbursement Problems
In 2007, healthcare
providers are facing unprecedented reimbursement crisis for healthcare
claim denials, delays and "overpayment" recoupment as well as managed
care PPO audits.
Several years ago, most
health care providers were seeing class actions against insurance
companies and managed care entities by 950,000 physicians across USA
after terribly failed political actions of "Patient's Bill of Rights"
campaign for eight years, and desperately hoping to see some positive
changes. In last several year those class actions were either settled
or dismissed by federal court.
Do you see any major
positive changes for your reimbursement?
No!
Now in 2007, the game is
totally different. More and more healthcare providers are the target
of healthcare fraud lawsuits and investigations, PPO fraud and abuse
audits, and more detrimentally harmful to financial bottom line for
many healthcare providers and facilities. We have been experiencing
more and more Volcano type of PPO audits and tornado type of
overpayment recoupment crisis from payers withholding subsequent claim
payments for millions of dollars, while no federal or state agency
seemed to have jurisdictions for healthcare provider’s Katrina crying
for justice, and while state government declined to intervene because
of ERISA preemption and federal government refused to investigate
because of alleged provider network contract agreement dispute, but
healthcare providers on behalf of your patients received no payments
or little payments for already approved claims as a result of
"overpayment" recoupment by the payers.
Most Comprehensive Research and
Analysis from US Supreme Court Rulings
US supreme court
unanimously ruled on June 21, 2004 that ERISA, a federal law, controls
and governs your problems in managed care crisis if you want any money
from the employer sponsored health plans.
Most Comprehensive, Advanced And
Practical Appeal Letters For “Overpayment Recoupment” Due To PPO
Audits And Medical Necessity As Well As Poor Documentation For Both
Self-Funded ERISA Plan And Fully-Insured ERISA Plan
Our new 2007 major
updates provide you with most powerful protections and advanced appeal
letters based on all of US Supreme Court recent rulings on managed
care reimbursement, ERISA state law and PPO preemption, state law
medical review preemption, and every type of practical arguments used
by payers in withholding and recouping benefits payment from
healthcare providers for those already approved benefits claims.
Latest Federal Court Ruling on
Disallowing Health Plan Recovery or Recoupment against Healthcare
Providers
Two new federal court
rulings on overpayment and state law prompted pay preemption relied
upon most recent US Supreme Court rulings, in addition to our 2006
updates in this area.
Latest Federal Court Ruling on
Definitive ERISA Preemption of State Prompt Pay Law.
For years, federal and
state regulators, legal and health care experts, health care providers
and insurance companies are not certain if federal law ERISA preempts
state Prompt Pay Laws, now federal court has ruled clearly that ERISA
definitely preempts state prompt pay laws based on analysis of Supreme
Court recent rulings.
97.96% Claims of United
Healthcare Lawsuit in These Case Were ERISA Claims
You will be also
surprised to learn that in this provider lawsuit against United
healthcare for wrongful denial of benefits claims
"Plaintiffs
lawsuit centers around 295 claims for services rendered by Schoedinger
to patients covered by United healthcare plans. 289 of these claims
qualify as Employee Welfare Benefit Plans under ERISA, and 6 involve
non-ERISA plans.5 268 of the ERISA claims surround self-funded or
self-insured health plans, in which the employers are financially
liable for any benefits due and United serves only as the plan
administrator and claims processor. 21 of the ERISA claims and all of
the non-ERISA claims involve health plans that are fully insured by
United. For these 27 claims, United is financially responsible for the
benefits due to plan participants and serves as the plan administrator
and claims processor."
No PPO Participation, No Checks
to Non-PPO Providers, but ERISA Laws Protect You
Because certain major payers are no longer sending reimbursement
checks to healthcare providers who were not participating in the
network, we have thoroughly researched federal law, ERISA, and
developed a most powerful but straightforward action plan package
based on specific federal ERISA regulation and requirements for
healthcare providers to receive reimbursement checks directly from the insurance payers.
New Federal Government Guidelines
on Filing Benefits Claims and Appeals
Our 2007 major updates
also include latest federal government, DOL, guidance on filing
healthcare claims and appeals
New Federal Government Guidelines
on Pre-Existing Condition Denials and Protections
Our 2007 major updates
also include latest federal government, DOL, guidance on filing
healthcare claims, appeals for pre-existing condition protections.
Our U.S. employment
market in modern society, divorce, relocation and adoption as well as
newborn babies have caused countless mysterious claim denials and
delays due to mysterious “additional information requesting” by payers
from patients and health care providers, but healthcare providers can
never find out what exactly addition information the payers are
looking for. These confidential information is not about privacy
compliance but pre-existing condition investigation, also governed by
HIPAA, money part of HIPAA regulation.
HIPAA pre-existing
condition regulation was never fully understood by healthcare
providers, as HIPAA is part of ERISA regulation.
If you want to get paid
quickly and accurately for 90% of your non-Medicare claims from
patients obtained health insurance from employment in private sectors,
you must understand and follow published federal government
guidelines.
How to Order?
Our new 2007 ERISA
Appeal Updates can be ordered for $95 by those who have previously
purchased our ERISA Appeal CD Book and Systems, and these
updates cannot be separately purchased without prior purchase of
ERISA Appeal CD Book and Systems for $450. However Our new 2007
ERISA Appeal Updates is free to those who have purchased ERISA
Appeal CD Book and Systems in past 30 days from
04/07/2007.
You may place your order
from our website, www.ERISAclaim.com on page of Appeal
Books and Systems at http://www.erisaclaim.com/products.htm
You may also call us at
630-736-2974 for a phone order or any questions |
|
New 2006
Appeal Letters (10/13/2006)
ERISA Appeal for
Overpayment Refund Request due to Medical Necessity and New PPO
Hearing
In accordance with
U.S. Supreme Court decision in Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila on
06/21/2004, “Medical necessity” dispute or denial and subsquent
overpayment request, is an ERISA plan retrospective administrative
remedy, and any non-ERISA “causes of
action, brought to remedy only the denial of benefits under
ERISA-regulated benefit plans, fall within the scope of, and are
completely pre-empted by, ERISA §502(a)(1)(B),......"
New 2006
Appeal Letters (10/04/2006)
Due to the
increasing Katrina style of plan OverPayment Recoupment or
Recovery denials, when plans withhold or reduce countless subsequent
or future plan approved claim payments by alleging recoupment or
recovery for previously overpaid claims to providers, we have added to
our ERISA Appeal
Book & System the
most powerful ERISA appeal letter (OverPayment Recoupmet Appeal 2006)
based on all applicable
U.S. Supreme Court rulings,
2432 Coercive or Fraudulent Interference with
ERISA Rights -- 29 U.S.C. 1141 and new ERISA
claim regulation as well as our practical experience and knowledge in
ERISA appeal practice.
New 2006 Appeal Letters (09/28/2006)
We have added two new and
updated appeal letters to our ERISA Appeal CD Book for increasing
overpayment refund requests and disputes from health plans and commercial collection
companies.
Our new and updated appeal
letters are based on ERISA claim regulation on denials-adverse
benefits determination, two new
U.S. Supreme Court rulings in Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila
on 06/21/2006 and Sereboff v. Mid Atlantic Medical
Services on 05/15/200 as well as federal “Fair Debt
Collection Practices Act”.
Pricing for copyrighted
update letters: Free to anyone who purchased our ERISA Appeal
CD Book in past 60 days (please email us for free password). $35 for
anyone who purchased our ERISA Appeal CD Book prior to past 60 days.
Who may use our
online secured order page to pay for your order
and password, then download the
letters from our
"Appeal Book & System Page". We do not
sell these appeal letters separately from our
ERISA Appeal CD Book
($450). |
|
ABATIE V ALTA HEALTH &
LIFE
9th Cir. 08/15/2006
"In addition, this case requires us to consider
how a court is to review an ERISA plan administrator’s decision when
the procedure that produced the decision did not
follow all statutory requirements. For the reasons
that we will develop, we
conclude that when a decision by an
administrator utterly fails to follow applicable procedures,
the administrator is not, in fact, exercising discretionary powers
under the plan, and its decision should be subject to de novo
review. Lesser irregularities, like the one in this case, do
not remove the decision from abuse of discretion review, but rather
should be factored into the calculus of whether the administrator
abused its discretion.
.....We have held
that an insurer that acts as both the plan administrator and the
funding source for benefits operates under what may be termed a
structural conflict of
interest......."
ERISAclaim.com Comment:
For a healthcare provider in appealing of denied
medical benefits claims, he/she must be able to prove through the
appeal that
"an administrator utterly
fails to follow applicable procedures" in initial
denial and subsequent appeal or reviews, among other things in a
successful appeal practice. This is more important than arguing
emotionally on medical merits of the claims, which most providers
have been doing.
For more latest
federal court cases impacting your claims denials and reimbursement,
please visit
our Managed Care Court Watch at ERISAclaim.com. |
Fact Sheet - EBSA Achieves Total Monetary Results Exceeding $1.7
Billion
(DOL,
January 2006)
"Through its enforcement of the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act (ERISA), the Employee Benefits Security
Administration (EBSA) is responsible for ensuring the integrity
of the private employee benefit plan system in the United
States. EBSA’s oversight authority extends to approximately
730,000 pension plans and another 6 million health and welfare
plans. These plans cover approximately 150 million workers and
their dependents and include assets of more than $4
trillion.......
Record $88.4 Million Restored to Workers through Informal
Complaint Resolution
When
workers experience a problem with an employee benefit plan,
EBSA has proven effective in
resolving their requests for assistance. In FY 2005,
EBSA’s Benefits Advisors handled
nearly 160,000 inquiries and recovered $88.4 million in benefits
on behalf of workers and their families through informal
resolution of individual complaints. Many of these inquiries
were received via
EBSA’s toll-free number:
1.866.444.EBSA (3272) and Web site:
www.askebsa.dol.gov.
These
inquiries are also a major source of enforcement leads. When
EBSA becomes aware of repeated
complaints with respect to a particular plan, employer, or
service provider, or when there is information indicating a
suspected fiduciary breach, the matter is referred for
investigation. In FY 2005, 1,067 new investigations were opened
as a result of referrals from Benefits Advisors."
U.S.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit to All Chiropractors
NO Appeal, No
Lawsuit!!!
Amer Chiro Assn Inc vs. Leavitt,
Michael O.
Released: 12/13/2005
"The jurisdictional question is more
complicated. “No action against the United States, the
[Secretary of Health and Human Services], or any officer or
employee thereof shall be brought under [28 U.S.C. §] 1331 . . .
to recover on any claim arising under” the Medicare Act. 42
U.S.C. §§ 405(h), 1395ii. Judicial review may be had only after
the claim has been presented to the Secretary and administrative
remedies have been exhausted.
See
42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), (h),
1395w-22(g)(5);
Shalala v. Ill. Council on Long Term Care, Inc.,
529 U.S. 1, 8-9 (2000);
Heckler v. Ringer,
466 U.S. 602, 614-15 (1984);
Weinberger v. Salfi,
422 U.S. 749, 763-64 (1975). This bar against § 1331 actions
applies to all claims that have their “standing and substantive
basis” in the Medicare Act.
Ill. Council,
529 U.S. at 11, 17 (quoting
Salfi,
422 U.S. at 761);
see also Ringer,
466 U.S. at 615....."[page 5 of 8]
"To
have such a claim heard, an enrollee could obtain the services of
a chiropractor without first obtaining a referral. After the HMO
refuses coverage because of the absence of a referral, the
enrollee could file a grievance with the HMO, claiming that the
referral requirement was illegal.
See
42 U.S.C. § 1395w 22(g)(1)(A); 42
C.F.R. §§ 422.562(a)(1), .566(a). This would trigger the
administrative process, at the end of which is judicial review of
the Secretary’s final decision.
See 42 U.S.C.
§ 1395w-22(g)(5); 42 C.F.R. § 422.612(a), (c). The chiropractor
who provided the service could also mount an administrative
challenge by “waiv[ing] any right to payment from the enrollee”
and becoming the enrollee’s assignee. 42 C.F.R. § 422.574(b)."
[page 6 of 8]
2009 GUIDE TO
New Medicare Claims Appeals Process
© 2005-6,
Jin Zhou,
ERISAclaim.com
---------------------
"Aggressive oversight and new improvement
efforts have cut the number of improper fee-for-service Medicare
claims payments by half in one year, from 10.1 percent in 2004
to 5.2 percent in 2005, a $9.5 billion reduction in improper
payments......"
|
Tort Reform,
Fraud & Healthcare Crisis? |
|
New From Center for Justice &
Democracy:
***New Study*** Falling Claims
and Rising Premiums in the Medical Malpractice Insurance
Industry (July 7, 2005)
Appendix
News Release: New Study
Leads Attorneys General to Proclaim “No Excuse” and “A
Matter of Life and Death” (July 7, 2005)
PDF
"Joanne
Doroshow, Executive Director of the Center for Justice &
Democracy, which commissioned the report, stated, “To
put it bluntly, if you look at what the insurance
companies say about why they raise premiums, and then
look at the data in this report, thenumbers just don’t
add up. The facts are very simple: medical malpractice
payouts are down yet insurance companies have
significantly increased premiums.
This shows that
the entire campaign to limit liability for doctors over
the last several years by capping compensation to
injured patients has been a fraud, and that based on
these data, insurers must know that it has been a
fraud.”
Study Backgrounder (July 7, 2005)
PDF
|
|
ERISAclaim.com - A $1.0 Trillion
Nuclear Solution to U.S. Health-care Crisis & $44 Trillion
Budget Deficits |
-
ERISAclaim.com - New! On-site Programs for ERISA & New CMS/Medicare
Compliance
-
ERISAclaim.com: An Unique Magic for Integrated Health Systems
-
ERISAclaim.com - ERISA, Who?
-
ERISAclaim.com - ERISA 1-2-3
-
ERISAclaim.com - HSA &/Or ERISA? 95% of HSA Are Still
ERISA's!
-
ERISAclaim.com - Rx for GM $5.6 Billion Health-care Crisis with
50% Savings
-
ERISAclaim.com - CMS New Appeal Rules: "Overhaul of the Medicare
Claims Appeals System"
|
Spring Seminar
Special:
Click the above
for more info
"CCI & Bundling
& Down Coding Denials and Appeals"
The
spring special will be included in all spring seminars |
|
For
Medicare and commercial claims and all specialties:
Medicare National Correct Coding Initiative/NCCI, Medicare
fraud and abuse prevention By NCCI, and bundling and down
coding claim denials and appeals.
NCCI was developed primarily for Medicare, but used by almost
every payer nationwide. This Information is for every payer
and almost every type of claims.
I: Medicare National Correct Coding
Initiative/NCCI
This course will cover the following topics:
HCPCS
Coding
Reasons for Incorrect Coding
CCI Basics
Modifiers
The Role of CSRs in CCI
CSR Action Steps
CCI Questions
CCI Resources
II: Medicare Fraud and Abuse Prevention:
In Medicare, some of the most common forms of fraud include:
*
Unbundling or "exploding" charges,
* Billing for a service not furnished as billed; i.e.,
upcoding.
III: How to Appeal Bundling And Down
Coding Partial Claim Denials by NCCI & ERISA.
Bundling & Down Coding Claim Partial Denials Are Identified As
The Number One And The Most Important And Popular Managed Care
Hassles By AMA (PSA) Through Nationwide State Medical
Associations And Medical Specialty Societies
|
Blue Cross And Blue Shield Plans File $30 Million
Lawsuit Alleging Rent-A-Patient Fraud In Southern California
(BCBSA.com, 03/11/2005)
ERISAclaim.com - Seminar in South Dakota:
March 18-19
Alert:
We will include one-hour coverage on New Medicare Appeal Process in each of
our ERISA Seminars
Starting from April 2005
|
Last Modified on Tuesday, March 01, 2005
Implementing a New Medicare Claims
Appeals Process (PDF
45K) (3 pages)
"The law
includes a series of structural and procedural changes to the
appeals process, including:
-
Uniform appeal
procedures for both Part A and Part B claims;
-
Reduced
decision-making time frames for most administrative appeals levels,
as well as the right to escalate a case that is not decided on time
to the next appeal level;
-
The establishment
of new entities, Qualified Independent Contractors (QICs), to
conduct reconsiderations of claims denials made by fiscal
intermediaries, carriers, and quality improvement organizations;
-
Use of QIC review
panels, which include medical professionals, to reconsider all cases
involving medical necessity issues; and
-
A requirement for
appeals-specific data collection by CMS......"
Changes to the appeals process
(PDF 646K) (511 pages)
"SUMMARY: Medicare beneficiaries and,
under certain circumstances, providers and suppliers of
health care services, can appeal adverse determinations
regarding claims for benefits under Medicare Part A and Part
B under sections 1869 and 1879 of the Social Security Act
(the Act). Section 521 of the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP
Benefits Act of 2000 (BIPA) amended section 1869 of the Act
to provide for significant changes to the Medicare claims
appeal procedures. This interim final rule responds to
comments on the November 15, 2002 proposed rule regarding
changes to these appeal procedures, establishes the
implementing regulations, and explains how the new
procedures will be implemented. It also sets forth
provisions that are needed to implement the new statutory
requirements enacted in Title IX of the Medicare
Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of
2003 (MMA).
DATES: Effective date:
These regulations
are effective on May 1, 2005. However, in view of the
wide span of applicability of these rules and the complex,
intertwined nature of the affected appeal procedures, not
all of these provisions can be implemented simultaneously.
Please see section I.E. of the preamble for a full
description of the implementation approach....."
|
|
Unanimous US Supreme Court Ruling
In US Health Care Crisis
by Jin Zhou,
02/11/2005
© 2005,
Jin Zhou,
ERISAclaim.com
Managed-Care Nightmares?
Health-Care Crisis without True Solutions?
What Does an Unanimous US Supreme Court Say?
On June 21, 2004, an unanimous US Supreme
Court ruled that claim processing and denials of benefits under the
employer-sponsored health plans,
ERISA-regulated benefit
plans,
for
both self-insured and
fully-insured (through purchase of insurance) health plans,
are completely governed by federal law ERISA, that supersedes and
invalidates state laws.
How
Can Anyone in USA, from Congress to General Motor to the White House,
from Industry Experts to Patient Advocates, Solve US Health Care Crisis
without Even Thinking of ERISA?
"Failure of Imagination" As a
Nation Is the Real Tragedy
ERISAclaim.com - Supreme Court Managed Care ERISA Watch
Unanimous US Supreme Court Ruling In US Health Care Crisis
Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila
06/21/04
Opinion of the
Court
"Held:
Respondents’ state causes of action fall
within ERISA§502(a)(1)(B), and are therefore completely
pre-empted by ERISA §502 and removable to federal court.
Pp. 4–20."
"We hold that
respondents’ causes of action, brought to
remedy only the denial of benefits under
ERISA-regulated benefit
plans, fall within the scope of, and are completely pre-empted
by, ERISA §502(a)(1)(B), and thus removable to federal
district court. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is
reversed, and the cases are remanded for further proceedings
consistent with this opinion.7
It is so ordered."
|
|
Health-Care 9/11 Report of 2005
Health-care WMD
by Jin Zhou,
02/05/2005
© 2005,
Jin Zhou,
ERISAclaim.com |
|
Unanimous US Supreme Court: |
Employer-Sponsored Health-Care Is Completely Governed by ERISA laws
and rules;
Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila,
06/21/04 |
|
Congressional Leaders: |
One Administration = One Voice = ERISA Self
Enforcement only, or
No Enforcement? |
|
Health-care Terrorists? |
"ERISA Advantage"
bogus plans,
"unlimited and frequent premium increases, and
the potential for rampant fraud with little, if any, regulatory
recourse" in 30 years of ERISA self enforcement. |
|
Health-care WMD (Weapons of Mass Destruction) |
"Medical
Inflation, WMD" for
"ERISA Advantage" from
ERISA Failure -
"Failure of Imagination" Again
for US Healthcare:
USA:
$1.9 Trillion, 15.7% of GDP
GM:
$5.6 Billion, $1,500 Per Car
Economists: Federal deficit a bigger risk than terrorism (USA
Today) "The survey, taken
between Feb. 28 and March 8, found U.S. businesses had three nearly
equal concerns about longer-term risks: health care, the aging
population and the federal deficit." |
|
USA
2005: |
-
Personal Bankruptcy
-
GM Chapter 11,
-
National healthcare expenditure $$1,9
trillion
-
One nation under debt
-
GAO Report: Tax
Expenditures Represent a Substantial Federal Commitment and Need to
Be Reexamined (PDF) (U.S. Government Accountability Office)
Abstract Highlights-PDF PDF
|
|
White House Rx: |
$1,000 HSA personal responsibility +AHP
with
More "ERISA advantage" for
"widespread
plan insolvencies and fraud" and
"A
Prescription For Disaster". |
|
2005 for Michael Moore? |
"John Q. ERISA
Enforcement"??? |
|
Congressional conclusion 2008:
|
"Failure of Imagination" Again, with No One's
Responsibility and Accountability. |

Department of Law
120 Broadway
New York, NY 10271
|
Department of Law
The State Capitol
Albany, NY 12224
|
| |
For More Information:
518-473-5525 |
For Immediate Release
February 10, 2005 |
|
|
|
"Attorney General Eliot Spitzer said
today that 21 health plans operating in New York have agreed
to take new steps to ensure that consumers have the
information they need to intelligently shop for health
coverage and obtain medically
necessary care.
Under the agreements, the health plans
have pledged to be more responsive to requests from
consumers for so-called "clinical
review criteria," which is used to determine whether
health care claims will be covered. In the past, health
plans have sometimes failed to
disclose these criteria and other essential coverage
information, discouraging access to needed care......
The clinical review
criteria are extremely
important to consumers with existing medical conditions
because they contain the standards that the health plans use
to determine whether a specific treatment is medically
necessary; if not, coverage is denied and the consumer is
left with the choice of either foregoing medical care or
paying out-of-pocket. The State Managed Care Consumer
Bill of Rights requires health plans to disclose these
criteria to both current and prospective enrollees upon
written request....."
02/10/05
Health Plans Agree to Provide Required Coverage Information
(click for complete official press release)
NEW YORK HEALTH PLANS PARTICIPATING IN
SETTLEMENT
Aetna US Healthcare
Atlantis Health Plan
Capital District Physicians' Health Plan (CDPHP)
CIGNA Healthcare of New York
ConnectiCare of New York
Empire HealthChoice
Excellus Health Plan
Group Health Inc. (GHI)
HealthFirst New York
Health Insurance Plan of Greater New York (HIP)
Health Net of New York
HealthNow New York
Horizon Healthcare of New York
Independent Health Association
MDNY Healthcare
MVP Health Plan
Oxford Health Plans of New York
Preferred Care
United Healthcare of New York
Vytra Health Plans
WellCare of New York
Attachment:
New York Managed Care Consumer Bill of Rights Compliance
Survey
|
|
Text: Employee Benefits in Private Industry in the United States,
2002-2003 (PDF) (Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S.
Department of Labor)
12/18/2004: President's Radio Address, (http://www.whitehouse.gov)
"Another challenge in our economy is the rising cost of health care.
More than half of all uninsured Americans are small business employees
and their families. And while many business owners want to provide
health care for their workers, they just can't afford the high cost. To
help more Americans get care, we need to expand tax-free health savings
accounts, which are already making a difference for small businesses and
families. We should encourage health information technology that
minimizes error and controls costs. And Congress must allow small firms
to join together and buy health insurance at the same discounts big
companies get."
| Subject: |
President's Radio Address:
Bush, ERISA, Health care??? |
| Date: |
12/19/2004 4:05:31 PM
Central Standard Time |
"Another
challenge in our economy is
the rising cost of health
care. More than half
of all uninsured Americans
are small business employees
and their families.
And while many business
owners want to provide
health care for their
workers, they just can't
afford the high cost.
To help more Americans get
care,
we need to expand tax-free
health savings accounts,
which are already making a
difference for small
businesses and families.
We should encourage health
information technology that
minimizes error and controls
costs. And Congress
must allow small firms to
join together and buy health
insurance at the same
discounts big companies
get."
Dx & Rx for "the rising cost
of health care":
HSA + ERISA + PPO = 5 X $1.8
Trillions for US
healthcare/year!!!.
"tax-free health savings
accounts" = HSA
"Congress must allow small
firms to join together" =
ERISA/MEWA/State Law
Pre-emption
Jin Zhou
ERISAclaim.com
630-736-2974
|
Opinion: Top Ten Health Policy Initiatives in 2005 (Galen
Institute)
Changes in Workers' Compensation in 2004 (PDF) (U.S. Bureau
of Labor Statistics)
Court Rules Indiana Marketing Firm and Executives Must Restore Losses to
Health Plan (DOL Media Release,
01/05/2005)
"Chicago, Illinois - A federal district
court in Indiana has ordered TRG Marketing, LLC of Indianapolis,
Indiana, and its executives to restore losses to the firm’s health
plan, pay unpaid health claims owed to plan participants nationwide,
and be permanently barred from serving as plan fiduciaries, according
to a judgment obtained by the U.S. Department of Labor. The judgment
resulted from a lawsuit in which the department alleged that TRG
executives diverted up to $3.4 million in health plan assets to pay
personal expenses for themselves and family members.......
Under the judgment, TRG, William Paul Crouse and
Carmelo Zanfei were removed from their positions with the TRG health
plan and are permanently barred from service in the future to any plan
governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).
The court found that the defendants engaged in self-dealing when they
used health premiums collected from employers to pay for commissions
to TRG’s enrollment brokers, trips overseas, expensive glassware,
personal expenses, charitable contributions, and a corporate line of
credit. A trial will be held to determine the amount to be repaid by
the defendants...."
Chao v Crouse
Cause No. 1:03-cv-1585-TAB-DFH
11/22/04
Title 29 U.S.C. § 1141 states:
"It shall be unlawful for any
person through the use of fraud, force, violence, or threat of
the use of force or violence, to restrain, coerce, intimidate,
or attempt to restrain, coerce, or intimidate any participant or
beneficiary for the purpose of interfering with or preventing
the exercise of any right to which he is or may become entitled
under the plan, this title, section 3001, or the Welfare and
Pension Plans Disclosure Act. Any person who willfully violates
this section shall be fined $10,000 or imprisoned for not more
than one year, or both. The amount of fine is governed by 18
U.S.C. § 3571. The U.S. Sentencing Guidelines address 29 U.S.C.
§ 1141 under the guidelines for "Fraud and Deceit" (U.S.S.G. §
2F1.1) or for "Extortion by Force or Threat of Injury or Serious
Damage (U.S.S.G. § 2B3.2)......"
"For example, Section 1141
would reach the use of deception directed
at misleading a welfare plan beneficiary as to the amount of
health benefits owed to the beneficiary under the terms of the
plan or at misleading a pension plan participant as to
the amount of retirement benefits to which he would become
entitled under the plan upon his retirement."
ERISA in the United States Code
|
|
Hospital CEO's Confessed Their Biggest Headaches:
Financial Challenges from Unpaid/Denied Medical Bills in 2004 |
|
71% of CEO's, out of 460
surveyed by American College of
Healthcare Executives ( ACHE)
in 2004, identified No.
1 headache, among other things, as financial challenges. Top 5
problems of financial troubles: Medicaid 78%, Bad Debt 72%,
Medicare 70%, Revenue Cycle Management 53% and Managed-care
Payments 52%. Care for the uninsured and personnel shortage were
ranked as No. 2 and No. 3 pressing issues. For more details, go to
ACHE's
Top Issues Confronting Hospitals: 2004
Dr. Jin Zhou, President of ERISAclaim.Com, has
strongly
advocated for the Hospital CEO's and the entire health care
industry to utilize and comply with the superpower of ERISA,
federal law, governing health care denials and
to create a new line of occupation, claim appeals specialist, to
cope with industry claim denial crisis, soon
to be tripled in 2005. |
HHS Issues Final Regulation on Access to Group
Health Coverage (12/29/2004, HHS)
Text of Final HIPAA Portability
Regulations (PDF)
(Internal Revenue Service, Employee Benefits Security
Administration, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services)
Text of Proposed HIPAA Portability Regulation
Modifying Break in Coverage, Special Enrollment Period (PDF)
(Internal Revenue Service, Employee Benefits Security
Administration, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services)
|
CMS News on Wheelchair and
Medical Necessity |
|
December 15, 2004:
MEDICARE OPENS NATIONAL COVERAGE
DETERMINATION TO MAKE SURE
BENEFICIARES WHO NEED
WHEELCHAIRS GET THEM
October
18, 2004:
MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES WILL SOON
BE ABLE TO RESOLVE MEDICARE
APPEALS FASTER
“We are working toward
completing our
overhaul of the Medicare claims
appeals system by October 1,
2005
to better serve Medicare
beneficiaries, providers,
physicians, and other health
care providers.”
"Other
steps that CMS is taking
as part of its
comprehensive overhaul of
Medicare claims appeals
include:
-
Finalizing the transfer
of responsibility for
the third level appeals
conducted by
Administrative Law
Judges from the Social
Security Administration
to the Department of
Health and Human
Services by October 1,
2005.
-
Developing a new
appeal-specific data
system that will allow
authorized users to
track individual
appeals in real time.
-
Establishing an
Administrative QIC that
will oversee the
distribution of
case-files, develop
appeals processing
protocols, conduct
training of the QICs,
and the dissemination of
information on QIC
appeals decisions to the
public.
-
Implementing a 60-day
decision deadline and
improved notices for
claims redeterminations,
or first-level appeals
performed by fiscal
intermediaries and
carriers. The
improved notices will
include the specific
reasons for the decision
and a summary of
relevant clinical or
scientific evidence used
in making the decision.
Issuing the final regulations
needed to implement the new
uniform appeals procedures,
including the rules QICs and
other appeals entities by the
end of the year."
|
Maximum Comfort,
Inc v. Tommy G. Thompson
(06/30/2004, United States
District Court for the Eastern District of California)
RenCare Ltd vs. Humana Health
Pln TX
(5th Cir. 12/30/2004)
|
PPO Fee
Splitting:
Vince Street Clinic v. Healthlink,
Inc.
No. 4-03-0876, (The
Illinois Appellate Court, 4 th
District,)
"This
case presents the question whether
a company that creates a list of
health-care providers that it
makes available for a charge to
members of health plans may enter
into an agreement under which the
health-care providers themselves
would pay to be included on the
list. We conclude the agreement
improperly requires physicians to
pay a fee for the referral of
patients."
AMNews: New Jersey doctors sue insurer
over forced payback ... American Medical
News (Jan.
3/10, 2005)
Doctors sue to block $15 million
repayment (Newark
Star Ledger, NJ - Nov 29,
2004)
N.J. Medical
Society Goes to Court To Block
Recoupment of $15M in Alleged
Overpayments
(11/30/2004, AP via Insuarnce Journal)
"The Medical Society of New Jersey
is seeking court action to prevent
an insurance company from
recouping $15
million in alleged overpayments to
doctors.
The society is seeking an injunction
against Horizon Blue Cross/Blue
Shield, which claims that over two
years it overpaid more than 600
doctors who performed heart
procedures.
The insurer has asked the physicians
to give back the money by Nov. 30."
[doc] Press Release: Horizon Agrees
To Temporarily Halt Efforts To
Recover Money From State’s
Cardiologists As A Result Of MSNJ
Lawsuit, 12-09-2004
Assemblyman Neil Cohen's Letter (pdf)
Some health care costs unnecessary (APP.COM)
"In recent months, Horizon has
seen a dramatic increase in the number of claims it is receiving,
Marino said. New Jerseyans, he said, are receiving more health care
yet, "the higher volume of services does not translate into improved
quality."
Medicare New Policy:
Medical Necessity in Emergency/Critical Care
On November 5th, CMS issued a modification to
the Medicare Integrity Manual for "Payment
for Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) and new
policy in making emergency room medical decision terminations",
and "Instructs that for an item or service provided
by a hospital or critical access hospital pursuant to section
1867of the Social Security Act (EMTALA) on or after January 1,
2004, FIs must make determinations of whether the item or
service is reasonable and necessary on the basis of information
available to the treating physician or practitioner (including
the patient’s presenting symptoms or complaint) at the time the
item or service was ordered or furnished by the physician or
practitioner (and not only on the patient’s principal
diagnosis). The frequency with which an item or service is
provided to the patient before or after the time of the service
shall not be a consideration."
CMS Manual System
Department of Health & Human Services (DHHS)
Pub. 100-08 Medicare
Program Integrity
Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services (CMS) Transmittal 86 Date: NOVEMBER 5, 2005
CHANGE REQUESTS 3437
http://www.cms.hhs.gov/manuals/pm_trans/R86PI.pdf
MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES WILL SOON BE ABLE TO RESOLVE MEDICARE
APPEALS FASTER
October 18, 2004
“We are working toward completing our
overhaul of the Medicare claims appeals system by October 1, 2005
to better serve Medicare beneficiaries, providers, physicians, and
other health care providers.”
|
CMA Rebuts Health Plan
Allegations of Unfair Physician Billing Practices
[Posted
11/11/04]
Click here to download CMA's letter to
DMHC.
MAINE UROLOGIST SENTENCED FOR HEALtTHCARE
FRAUD
(United States Department of Justice) Ocober 6, 2004
Calif. attorney general launches insurance probe
"SAN FRANCISCO,
Oct 29 (Reuters) - California's
Attorney General Bill Lockyer has
launched an investigation into
possible antitrust violations and
fraud by insurance companies and
brokers, his office said on Friday."
INSURANCE COMMISSIONER
JOHN GARAMENDI SUES BROKER AND 4 MAJOR INSURERS OVER SECRET COMMISSIONS AND
KICKBACK SCHEMES THAT NETTED “MILLIONS OF DOLLARS”
The
Complaint
and a
copy of the settlement
agreement can be accessed by clicking the
links.
Release Date: 10/21/2004
"EBSA closed 4,399 civil investigations in
FY 2004. Nearly 70% of those investigations resulted in correction
of violations under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
(ERISA). Criminal investigations led to
the indictment of 121 individuals. In addition, EBSA received a
record 474 applications to participate in its compliance assistance
program to help employers and plan officials to voluntarily correct
specific violations of the law."
EBSA Achieves Record $3.1 Billion in Fiscal Year 2004
Results •
Press Release
|
|
|
Happy or Sad
30th Birthday To ERISA?
(Copyright
© 2004
by
Jin Zhou, ERISAclaim.com)
Sept. 2, 2004
On Sept. 2, 1974,
exactly 30 years ago today, ERISA, The Employee Retirement
Income Security Act,
was signed into law by President
Gerald R. Ford. The congressional intent in enacting
ERISA was to protect employees in pension and welfare plans, to
provide uniform federal protections in response to the failure
of the Studebaker Co. in December 1963, with thousands of
long-service employees cheated out off their promised pensions,
and to preempt any state laws when the employees pension and
welfare benefits were threatened. 30 years later, ERISA Failure
in its compliance and enforcement left thousands of retirees
without medical benefits, and resulted in a skyrocketing
national healthcare expenditure explosion with 45 million
uninsured and a possible national pension bailout.
ERISA Failure Syndrome
U.S. Healthcare Crisis Trilogy
Jin Zhou Identifies "ERISA Failure" That Killed
U.S. Healthcare
"Failure of Imagination" Again?
|
|
ERISA Celebrates 30th Anniversary As Trouble Brews For the Pension
Insurance Program (Spencer Benefits Reports)
Excerpt: "The seed for
ERISA was planted with the failure of the Studebaker Company in
December 1963, leaving thousands of long-service employees
without their promised pensions."
|
|
Quick Links to
Today's Opinions from
Federal Court of
Appeals (Links)
Federal_Courts_Finder
&
Circuit/District Map
(Copyright
© 2004
by
Jin Zhou, ERISAclaim.com) |
|
U.S.
Court of Appeals, 1st Cir. |
U.S.
Court of Appeals, 7th Cir. |
|
U.S.
Court of Appeals, 2nd Cir. |
U.S.
Court of Appeals, 8th Cir. |
|
U.S.
Court of Appeals, 3rd Cir. |
U.S. Court of
Appeals, 9th Cir. |
|
U.S.
Court of Appeals, 4th Cir. |
U.S.
Court of Appeals, 10th Cir. |
|
U.S. Court of
Appeals, 5th Cir. |
U.S. Court of
Appeals, 11th Cir. |
|
U.S. Court of
Appeals, 6th Cir. |
U.S.
Court of Appeals, D.C. Cir. |
Post Supreme Court Davila
Scoop:
ERISA
Pre-emption of State Laws in Healthcare
Medicare & ERISA, Am I in
Trouble Again?
(2X$+IR$+$5K)
+$183
million
|
Medicare Secondary
Payer: Improvements Needed to Enhance
Debt, GAO Says (U.S.
Government Accountability Office)
32 pages. Excerpt: "Last
year, employer-sponsored group health
plans ... were responsible for most of the nearly
$183 million in outstanding Medicare secondary payer (MSP) debt.
MSP debts arise when Medicare inadvertently pays for services
that are subsequently determined to be the financial
responsibility of another. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services ... administers Medicare with the assistance of about
50 contractors that, as part of their duties, are required to
recover MSP debt."
Telecare Corp. v. Leavitt
(Fed. Cir. 2005)
ERISAclaim.com:
"employer-sponsored group health plans"
=
"ERISA-regulated benefit
plans",
both self-insured and fully-insured
(through purchase of insurance) health
plans,
(ERISA
- Title 29, Chapter 18.
Sec. 1002.)
Inquiry on Medicare Finds Improper Limits on
Choices of Health Care Providers (The New York Times;
one-time registration required)
Excerpt: "Federal
investigators said Monday that the
Bush administration had improperly
allowed some private health plans to
limit Medicare patients' choice of
health care providers, including
doctors, nursing homes and home care
agencies."
Medicare Demonstration PPOs: Financial and Other
Advantages for Plans, Few Advantages for Beneficiaries
GAO-04-960, September 27, 2004
Abstract
Highlights-PDF
PDF
MEDICARE OVERPAYMENTS REACHED NEARLY
$20 BILLION IN 2003, NEW SURVEY FINDS
(PharmExec)
CMS ANNOUNCES IMPROVED EFFORTS TO REDUCE MEDICARE
PAYMENT ERROR RATES
(12/13/2004, CMS Press Release)
|
California SB 1569/Knox-Keene Act, "Allowing
Physicians to Sue Health Plans for Fair Payment",
Will be Preempted by ERISA
(Copyright
© 2004
by
Jin Zhou, ERISAclaim.com)
08/30/2004
"The article is
to explore whether the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
(ERISA), 88 Stat. 832, 29 U. S. C. §1001 et seq., pre-empts
California
"SB 1569"/Knox-Keene Act
to the
extent it applies to ERISA plans.
I believe
it does, in accordance with the Supreme Court ruling for both
Egelhoff v. Egelhoff
and
Aetna Health Inc.
v. Davila."
DOL Advisory Opinion 96-06A
"This is in response to your request for an advisory opinion concerning the
applicability of Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
(ERISA). Specifically, you ask whether California's Knox-Keene Health Care
Service Plan Act of 1975, California Health & Safety Code Section 1340 et seq.
(Knox-Keene), would be preempted by section 514(a) of
Title I of ERISA if it were applied to prohibit a welfare benefit plan
from providing participants with incentives to influence their choices among
alternative benefits offered under the plan."
Business Insurance -
"Helped by lower-than-expected
health care cost increases, managed care companies’ net income
increased by 40.3% for the first nine
months of 2004, according to a report by Oldwick, N.J.-based A.M.
Best Co. The 15 largest managed care companies reported total
profits of $6.17 billion for the nine
months ending Sept. 30, 2004, compared with
$4.40 billion in the year-earlier period. "
HMOs Earn $10.2 Billion in 2003, Nearly Doubling Profits, According to
Weiss Ratings;
Blue Cross Blue Shield Plans Report 63% Jump in Earnings
(BUSINESS WIRE)--Aug. 30, 2004
California Nurses Association: New Study Documents High Markups on
Hospital Charges
Class-Action Status Is
Upheld for Doctors Suing Insurers
(The
New York Times)
"An appeals court upheld class-action status
yesterday for a lawsuit brought on behalf of at least 600,000 doctors
contending that six of the nation's largest health insurers regularly
reduce payments for medical services."
Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
Affirms Class Certification for RICO Lawsuit Filed by the Nation’s
Doctors Against Leading HMOs (hmocrisis.com)
"Plaintiff’s
Lead Counsel Archie Lamb: Largest Physician Led Class Certification in
Federal Court History Has Now Been Affirmed
Wednesday
September 1, 2004: The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
issued a sweeping decision today affirming class action certification
in the landmark RICO case filed to combat widespread and chronic
abuses by some of the nation’s largest for profit HMOs."
|
|
82M U.S. Residents Uninsured at Some Point Over Last
Two Years, Study Says - Kaisernetwork.org
EBRI Frequently Asked
Questions About Benefits
One in Three: Non-Elderly Americans Without Health Insurance,
2002-2003 (Families USA)
Doctored Books (motherjones.com)
"Richard Scruggs sued Big
Tobacco and won. Now, he's taking on some of the nation's biggest
non-profit hospital chains on behalf of the uninsured."
Nonprofit Hospitals Said to Overcharge Uninsured (The
New York Times)
"A group of plaintiffs' lawyers filed civil
lawsuits against more than a dozen nonprofit hospitals across the
country yesterday, contending that the hospitals violated their
obligation as charities by overcharging people without insurance and
then hounding them for the money."
|
NEW Utah State
law Mandates ERISA Claim Regulation
(Copyright
© 2004
by
Jin Zhou, ERISAclaim.com)
Did you
know that, since enacted on May 17, 2002,
a NEW Utah State law,
UT Admin Code R590-203. Health Grievance Review Process and
Disability Claims., has mandated every health insurer and
HMO conducting business in the State of Utah to comply with ERISA claim
regulation, regardless if the plan is actually an ERISA plan?
This is the first state law for health insurance and manage care that
mandates and clones ERISA claim regulation at state-level. More and more
states are expected to follow.
UT Admin Code R590-203. Health Grievance Review
Process and Disability Claims.
"R590-203-2.
Purpose.
The purpose of this rule is to ensure that health insurer's
grievance review procedures for individual and employer health benefit
plans comply with the Department of Labor, Pension and Welfare Benefits
Administration Rules and Regulations for Administration and Enforcement:
Claims Procedure, 29 CFR 2560.503-1, Utah Code Sections 31A-4-116 and
31A-22-629."
(Bulletin)
(Utah
Code Section 31A-22-629)
PROPOSED RULE CHANGE-
R590-203, Health Grievance Review Process
and Disability Claims
This rule is being amended. A hearing
has been scheduled for 12-2-04
at 1pm in Room 3112 of the State Office Building.
Written comments
will be accepted until 12-15-04.
R590-232, Authorization for a Health Maintenance Organization to
Provide Services as Third Party Administrator of Health Care Benefits
|
|
Who Can Be a Medical Reviewer under ERISA?
(Copyright
© 2004
by
Jin Zhou, ERISAclaim.com)
U.S. SUPREME COURT
Docket for 03-83
ORAL ARGUMENT TRANSCRIPTS (page
46 0f 49)
|
02-1845.
Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila |
03/23/04 |
"QUESTION: Mr.
Estrada, you can address what you would like but there are three
points that have come up during the Respondent's presentation
that I'd be interested with a response to.
Number one, is it true
that the people who make the decisions for your client must be
medical doctors in Texas?
MR. ESTRADA:
Well it is true by virtue of DOL regulations which provide that
no claim may be turned down without input from a medical
professional in the relevant area"
|
|
New Federal Claim Regulation
(Final Rule)
-
"Plans must
consult with
appropriate health care
professionals in
deciding appealed claims
involving medical judgment."
[70268-70269,
CFR § 2560.503-1(h)(3)(iii)]
-
"The term `health care professional' means a
physician or other health care professional
licensed, accredited,
or certified to perform specified health
services
consistent with State law." [page
70271
CFR § 2560.503-1(m)(7)]
-
"medical doctors in Texas"
=
MD licensed to practice medicine in Texas
for a Texas ERISA case;
-
"a medical professional in the
relevant area" = relevant area of state laws in license
jurisdiction, scope of practice and relevant local standard of care;
-
"licensed"
= licensed by the State Government/licensing board;
-
"to
perform" = to practice
medicine or health care services in the
State;
-
"specified
health services"
= medical procedures or services being reviewed or denied, instead of
file review or insurance coverage reviews
services;
-
"consistent
with State law"
= consistent with State laws where the health care professional is
legally licensed to practice medicine or health care services with
respect to state jurisdictions, scope of license and state local
medical standard of care.
"The term `health care professional' means, in layman term, a
physician or other health care professional who is at least licensed in
your state (and more, board certified too) to practice the
specified/specific health services being reviewed or denied of your
claims, consistent with your state law jurisdiction, scope of practice
and local medical standard of care. Someone who is not licensed to
practice the same health care services specified/denied in your claims
is not qualified as an "appropriate health care professionals" as
defined under ERISA
§ 2560.503-1(m)(7).
Someone who is not licensed in your state to
practice "specified health services" but who is merely registered under
state or other means (URAC, IME, SSD or Peer Reviews) to do Utilization
Reviews (UR)
is not qualified as an "appropriate health care professionals" as
defined under ERISA
§ 2560.503-1(m)(7).
U.S.
Supreme Court visited ERISAclaim.com in regard to ERISA
§ 2560.503-1(h) at 11:57:03 AM on Friday, November 21, 2003 for this
No. one point.
Click here for more coverage of Supreme Court Visiting at
ERISAClaim.com.
|
|

"New
Strike Force" |
Medical Fraud Every Day?
Appeal or Re-Bill After
Denial?
You Must APPEAL
No Re-Billing!!!
Claim Appeal or
Sentencing Appeal?
Your Choice
Maximal Reimbursement
through ERISA Appeal &
Fraud Prevention and
Compliance
|
|
Aetna:
Leading the Fight Against Health Care Fraud
[PDF]
View as HTML
"Thanks to this highly collaborative
relationship, we know how to identify fraud because we know
what to look for.
Medical Fraud
-
Unusual provider billing
practices.
Discrepancy between the
submitted diagnosis and the treatment.
Diagnoses or treatments that
are outside the practitioner’s scope of practice.
Claims that are resubmitted
with coding changes to gain benefits.
Alterations on claim
submissions.
Pressure for quick claim
payment."
Payments Go Under a Microscope (washingtonpost.com)
January 12,
2004
"MAMSI and
CareFirst
recoup overpayments to doctors by
making deductions from future reimbursements.
Doctors can appeal insurers'
decisions. But, in the end, they usually pay up, doctors
and insurers agree."
Employers Audit Workers' Health Claims
(Wall Street Journal via SFGate.com)
Excerpt: "Looking to
bring down soaring health-care costs anywhere they can, more
employers are scouring their health plans for fraud, abuse and
simple mistakes by employees or administrators.
.......The
number of requests for such audits jumped 50 percent last year,
Mr. Farley estimates."
Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association Announces New Strike
Force to Protect American Consumers from Fraud and Fight Rising
Costs (U.S.
Newswire, 4/19/2004)
"DETROIT, April 19 /U.S.
Newswire/ -- The Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association (BCBSA)
today announced a new Anti-Fraud Strike Force comprised of top
Blue Plan investigators that will work with the Federal Bureau
of Investigation (FBI) and other national, state and local law
enforcement agencies to fight major insurance fraud schemes that
rob consumers of millions of dollars annually. BCBSA President
and CEO Scott P. Serota announced the new initiative in a speech
to the Detroit Economic Club."
"The National Health Care Anti-Fraud
Association (NHCAA) estimates that healthcare fraud costs
American consumers more than $50 billion annually. Billing for
services not rendered and misrepresentation of provided services
are the most common types of healthcare fraud."
Task force targets health care cheats - (04/20/04,
The Detroit News)
Clinton Township Firm Convicted of
Overbilling (Macomb
Daily)
"The case is somewhat
unusual in that a corporation was named as a criminal defendant
in the case,
but Kaiser said that is not unheard of since corporate law can
make a firm liable for criminal wrongdoing, and its principal
office holders in return are responsible for any judgments or
punishments the courts impose.
David Griem,
the defense attorney for Emergency Management who was also named
the principal to enter a guilty plea on its behalf,
also could not be reached for comment after the sentencing
hearing. In court, however, he turned over a check to the Blue
Cross insurance company officials in attendance and said the
company would pay the $5,000 court costs on time as well."
Medicare | Fraud, Abuse in Medicare and Medicaid Could Exceed
Government Tracking Figures - Kaisernetwork.org
|
Health Care Fraud Report
Fiscal Year 1998

|
USDOJ: Deputy Attorney
General: Publications and Documents - - Health Care Fraud
Report Fiscal Year 1998
"On June
4, 1998, in the District of Maryland, Levindale Geriatric
Hospital paid $800,000 to resolve allegations it violated
the FCA by recoding and resubmitting
denied charges for room and board. After the claims for room
and board were denied by the Medicare Part A program,
Levindale recoded the claims as supplies, laboratory work
and other services, and submitted the claims for payment.
In addition to paying a substantial penalty under the FCA,
Levindale entered into a compliance agreement with HHS-OIG"
|
|
|
New Study:
ER
Denials?
Medical or ERISA Appeals? Appeals!
(Copyright
© 2004
by
Jin Zhou, ERISAclaim.com)
"There are two
take-home messages for health professionals," Hall said. "One,
insurers much less often question the
appropriateness of emergency services" = not about
Medical necessity;
"and two, if insurers
initially deny coverage for emergency care,
providers or patients should appeal."
= ERISA Appeals
"However, some
compliance problems did emerge. Some insurers, Hall told
Reuters Health, initially deny ED claims
and then "quickly reverse" their decision if challenged."
= always denials.
|
"However, some compliance
problems did emerge. Some insurers, Hall told Reuters Health,
initially deny ED claims and then "quickly reverse" their decision
if challenged.
"There are two take-home
messages for health professionals," Hall said. "One, insurers much
less often question the appropriateness of emergency services and
two, if insurers initially deny coverage for emergency care,
providers or patients should appeal."
The impact and enforcement of prudent layperson laws
(Mark
A. Hall, JD,
Annals of Emergency Medicine Online,
May 2004 • Volume 43 • Number 5)
[ABSTRACT]
[FULL
TEXT] [
PDF]
|
|
Who
Would Decide
When to
Discharge A Patient?
(Copyright
© 2004
by
Jin Zhou, ERISAclaim.com)
U.S. SUPREME COURT
Docket for 03-83
ORAL ARGUMENT TRANSCRIPTS (page
16-17 0f 49)
|
02-1845.
Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila |
03/23/04 |
"QUESTION: Yes, but in the situation in the
hospital case, there was no time to get relief. How could they
-- how could they get relief from the denial of the extra day in
the hospital between midnight and the next morning?
.....
MR. FELDMAN: It's up to
her doctor, with whom she has a doctor patient relationship
that's a consensual relationship for providing medical
treatment. It's up to her doctor to decide when she should be
discharged from the hospital and when she shouldn't."
(Page
17-19)
JAMES A. FELDMAN, ESQ.,
Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice,
Washington, D.C.; on behalf of the United States, as amicus
curiae, supporting petitioners.
|
U.S. Health-care Crisis & ERISA Criminal
Enforcement
|
Employers Audit Workers' Health Claims (Wall Street
Journal via SFGate.com) &
(MLive.com, MI)
Excerpt: "Looking to bring down soaring health-care costs
anywhere they can, more employers are scouring their health
plans for fraud, abuse and simple mistakes by employees or
administrators.
.......The
number of requests for such audits jumped 50 percent last year,
Mr. Farley estimates."
CMS ISSUES INTERIM FINAL RULE ADDRESSING PHYSICIAN
SELF-REFERRALS (CMS News, March 25, 2004)

2004.02.19: Text of Letter From Tommy G. Thompson Secretary of
Health and Human Services To Richard J. Davidson, President,
American Hospital Association.
HHS FAQ "Questions On Charges For The Uninsured" (PDF)
HHS FAQ's "regarding offering discounts to
the uninsured" (PDF)
OIG
"HOSPITAL DISCOUNTS OFFERED TO
PATIENTS WHO CANNOT AFFORD TO PAY THEIR HOSPITAL BILLS"
Press Release
Complaint (pdf)
U.S. FILES COMPLAINT AGAINST NATIONAL ACCOUNTING FIRM UNDER
FALSE CLAIMS ACT
"January 5, 2004
- PHILADELPHIA – United States Attorney Patrick L.
Meehan announced today the filing of the Government's
complaint against national accounting firm Ernst &
Young. According to the complaint, nine hospitals paid
Ernst & Young for billing advice – advice which later caused
the submission of false claims to the Medicare program."
.....
"It is the responsibility of an
independent reviewer to be alert to fraud and abuse and
certainly not to ignore it," said Meehan. "In this case, as
the complaint alleges, Ernst & Young kept itself
deliberately ignorant of the facts."
OIG: Special Advisory Bulletin: Practices of
Business Consultants
[PDF]
[http://oig.hhs.gov/fraud/docs/alertsandbulletins/consultants.pdf]
The Office of Inspector General (OIG), Department of Health and
Human Services, June, 2001
Labor Department Sues Corporation For Violating Federal Employee
Benefit Law (Release Date: 02/02/2004)
"Columbus, Ohio - The U.S. Department of Labor has
sued defunct General Clay Products Corporation, of Columbus,
Ohio, for abandoning the company’s retirement plan, and also
filed suit against its president for failing to forward
employee contributions to the health plan. The alleged
violations resulted in the loss of health insurance coverage
for company workers."
‘‘Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization
Act of 2003’’ (pdf) (415) (A full text of the H.R. 1)
JS-1061: Treasury Issues Guidance To Encourage Use Of New
Innovative Health Savings Accounts ("HSAs")
Text of IRS Notice 2004-2: Guidance on Health Savings Accounts
(PDF) (Internal Revenue Service)
13 pages. Excerpt: "This notice provides certain basic
information about HSAs in question and answer format, without
attempting to enumerate all of the specific rules that apply
under section 223. The notice is divided into five parts. Part
I of the notice explains what HSAs are and who can have them.
Part II describes how HSAs can be established. Parts III and
IV cover contributions to HSAs and distributions from HSAs.
Part V discusses other matters relating to HSAs."
Overview of Health Savings Accounts With Chart Comparison to
Archer MSAs, HRAs and FSAs (PDF) (Miller &
Chevalier Chartered)
How Health Savings Accounts Compare To FSAs and HRAs
(Groom Law Group)
IRS Modifies HSA Eligibility Rule for 2004, 2005 for Individuals
Covered by Prescription Drug Plan (PDF) (Internal Revenue
Service)
Rev. Rul. 2004-38 Clarifies HSA Eligibility Rule for Individuals
Covered by Prescription Drug Plans (PDF) (Internal Revenue
Service)
IRS Provides Safe Harbor for Preventive Care Benefits Under
High-Deductible Health Plan (PDF) (Internal Revenue
Service)
HSAs Established Before April 15, 2005 Can Cover Expenses Incurred On
or After January 1, 2004 (PDF) (Internal Revenue Service)
Frequently Asked Questions About Health Savings Accounts (HSAs)
(U.S. Treasury Department)
Text of Rev. Rul. 2004-45 on Interaction of Health Savings Accounts
with Other Health Arrangements (PDF) (Internal Revenue
Service)
JS-1535: Treasury Clarifies Interaction Of Health Savings Accounts
With Other Employer-Provided Health Reimbursement Plans
Draft Form Issued by IRS: Model Health Savings Account for Use by
Trustees (PDF) (Internal Revenue Service)
Draft Form Issued by IRS: Model Health Savings Account for Use by
Custodians (PDF) (Internal Revenue Service)
Text of Notice 2004-50 Providing 88 Q&As on Health Savings Accounts
(PDF) (Internal Revenue Service)
30 pages. Excerpt: "This notice provides guidance on Health
Savings Accounts.... Notice 2004-2, 2004-2 I.R.B. 269,
provides certain basic information on HSAs in question and
answer format. This notice addresses additional questions
relating to HSAs."
Text of Notice 2004-50 Providing 88 Q&As on Health Savings
Accounts (PDF) (Internal Revenue Service)
(Revised and corrected--Aug. 9, 2004) 32 pages
IRS Announcement 2004-67 (Sept. 7, 2004) (page 54 of 57)
CORRECTIONS
"The last sentence in A–14 of Notice 2004–2 which currently
reads, “After an individual has attained age 65 (the Medicare
eligibility age), contributions, including catch-up
contributions, cannot be made to an individual’s HSA”, is
corrected to read as follows: “After an individual has
attained age 65 and becomes enrolled in Medicare benefits,
contributions, including catch-up contributions, cannot be
made to an individual’s HSA.” Additionally, the terms “becomes
eligible for” in the first sentence of the Example in A–14 of
Notice 2004–2 are replaced by “becomes enrolled in”.
Final Versions of Combined
HSA/Archer MSA Reporting Forms and Instructions for Trustees
and Custodians:
Form 1099-SA and
Instructions
Form 5498-SA
Analysis: Comprehensive HSA Guidance Clarifies Many Issues,
Sets Forth Several New Rules (Groom Law Group)
Text of Proposed Regs for Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit
(PDF)
233 pages. (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services,
Department of Health and Human Services)
ERIC Summary Outline for Employer Sections (Title 1; J & R) of
the Medicare Regulations (ERISA Industry Committee)
ABA Joint Committee on Employee Benefits
Agency Q-As
ABA Reports Various Employee Benefit Regulators' Views on
Health Issues (Deloitte's Washington Bulletin)
Overview: 2005 Medicare Premiums, Deductibles and Coinsurance
(The Segal Company)
|
New Seminar in Ohio
New federal law/ERISA Preservice Claims
Pre-certification Denials and Appeals
|
|
Breaking News
Judge approves $540 million Cigna settlement with doctors
950,000 Physicians Agreed to Do ERISA Appeals
in
Settlement of Physician Class-Action
Lawsuits
Judge Approves Aetna Settlement (CNN, 10/25/03)
"Aetna
and CIGNA Settlement Secrets"
"Talking
Points"
What You Should Know about Filing Your Health Benefits Claim
Did you know that
950,000 physicians nationwide have settled and agreed with Aetna and
CIGNA in their class-action lawsuit that 950,000 physicians must
complete two levels of
ERISA appeals as health plans internal appeals for both ERISA claims
and non-ERISA claims before they can access the state protections
through state external review laws?
Did you know that 40 states
require the completion of
ERISA appeals by physicians or patients as health plan internal
appeals before anyone can claim stayed law protections through state
external review laws?
Ask your state association for
more details on how to complete ERISA appeals for your denied and
delayed medical claims.
Click here for class-action lawsuit agreements
with Aetna and CIGNA.
Federal Judge Permits Doctors To Seek Damages From HMOs for Violating RICO
Act (KaiserNetwork.org)
Judge Sides With Doctors Over Insurers (
New York Times )
Nearly Sixty Blue Cross/Blue
Shield Affiliates throughout the Country Sued by Physicians
(HMO
Crisis Newsroom)
*00-1334-MD
Transfer Order - 09/25/03 (pdf)
Thomas/Kutell, MD v. BCBS,
Case #03-21296 - Judge Dubé
May 22, 03 Plaintiffs'
Class Action Complaint / Part 1
/
Part 2
May 22, 03 Civil Rico
Case Statement Pursuant to Local Rule 12.1
Jun 29, 04 Subpoena Duces Tecum: National Account Service Company LLC
(produce docs: 7/27/04)
Jun 18, 04 Plaintiffs' Second
Amended Class Action Complaint
Jun 28, 04 Solomon: First Amended Complaint - Class Action
"Forty
states required individuals to first exhaust their health policy’s
internal appeals and grievance process before seeking external review."
(GAO, September 2003, Page 46) The health policy’s internal
appeals and grievance process =
ERISA appeals
for
80% of the health claims.
"GAO was
asked to summarize current federal and state requirements for health
coverage offered by small businesses, including mandated benefits,
premium-setting requirements, and requirements regarding availability
of coverage."
|
|
|
New Federal Claim
Regulation (Final Rule)
After a
one year
delay,
New
Federal Benefit Claims Procedure Regulation has become
effective
January 01, 2003 for almost all of the
private group health plans. It will affect
about
80% of
health-care claims or
60% of health expenditures,
approximately
6 million private health and welfare plans and approximately 150 million
workers and their dependents
in the U. S..
|
|
"The
regulation will affect
participants and beneficiaries of employee benefit plans,
employers who sponsor employee benefit plans, plan fiduciaries, and others
who assist in the provision of plan benefits, such as third-party benefits
administrators and
health service providers or
health maintenance organizations that provide benefits to
participants and beneficiaries
of employee benefit plans." |
|
The
Regulation is the
most significant change
in health-care laws since 1977, and it has been considered by
congressional leaders to be more powerful than proposed Patients Bill Of
Rights. "The
regulation establishes
new standards for the processing of
claims under group health plans and plans providing disability benefits and
further clarifies existing standards for all other employee benefit plans.
The new standards are intended to ensure
more timely
benefit
determinations, to improve access to information on which a benefit
determination is made, and to assure that participants and
beneficiaries will be afforded
a full and fair review of denied
claims."
|
|
Contrary to the popular belief, the
new federal claim regulation provides
more
protections for
physicians and patients than
state insurance and
Prompt Pay Laws, and more protections and clarifications for
insurance companies and the ERISA plan sponsors as well as the third
party benefits administrators than state laws in punitive damages as
proposed in Patients
Bill Of Rights.
However,
failure to understand and comply timely
with
the
regulation will invite and suffer from unanticipated financial
and legal consequences.
AMA has finally noticed the existence and effective date of this
new
federal claim regulation, as described in its
January 20, 2003 online edition of American Medical News: "Federal
regulations that dictate rapid turnaround times for health plan claims
and appeals quietly went into effect this
month, with little noise from the managed care industry."
However AMA
has failed,
as it did in past 28 years,
to practically and meaningfully understand
the
ERISA
and its
significance as protections for
health-care providers, entire industry has failed to offer any
educational programs and
occupational trainings to health-care
providers in this most important
federal law and regulation that
governs and regulates
up to
80% of
health-care claims and
60% of
U.S. healthcare expenditures.
As reported by AMA as to the time it may take for
this
new federal claim regulation to take effect in marketplace,
Jeffery Mandell, president of the ERISA Law Group in Boise, Idaho,
states "it often takes years, even decades, for the marketplace to fully
adopt new regulations".
Life is too short, our nation's health-care system is going through
the
worst crisis since World War II and can't afford another 28 years to
realize and implement the
ERISA
regulations. We, everyone including health-care providers,
legislators, regulators and
insurance companies and TPA's, should take
immediate actions to educate everyone in the system and to implement
this
new
federal claim regulation as we are fighting against terrorists to
save our nation's
health-care system from worse-than-terror-war crisis.
The latest Harvard & RAND study for Congress and state legislative debate on Patients'
Bills of Rights, conducted by David Studdert and Carole Roan Gresenz,
study authors from the Harvard School of Public Health and RAND, funded
by federal government, Department Of Labor, and Agency for Health Care
Research and Quality, revealed that
"little is publicly known about such appeals system", and concluded
that "A
majority of preservice appeals disputed choice of
provider or contractual coverage issues, rather than medical necessity.
Medical necessity disputes proliferate not around life-saving treatments
but in areas of societal uncertainty about the legitimate boundaries of
insurance coverage. Greater transparency about the coverage status of
specific services, through more precise
contractual language and consumer education about benefits limitations,
may help to avoid a large proportion of disputes in managed care."
A
JAMA Editorial commenting this study further supported the
conclusion of this study and advanced the
right solutions
more precisely at
New
ERISA Claim Regulations: "Regulations
issued by the Clinton administration in 2000
were designed to infuse rigor into the appeals process maintained by
employer-sponsored health plans covered by the Employee Retirement
Income
Security Act (ERISA),10 which governs insurance arrangements
for more than 150 million workers and their family members. Whether
these rules will be vigorously enforced remains to be seen."
This valuable study has pointed out the direction but failed to provide
a
turnkey practical solution.
ERISAclaim.com has provided this nation with
a turnkey operational
solution with ERISA compliance,
to educate
everyone on ERISA, coverage and
claim
procedures, to ensure
"Bill Of Rights" for Patients, Providers, Plan
Sponsors and Insurers.
Aetna
(DOL/ERISA),
First Health,
Blue Cross Blue
Shield are ready to comply with new federal regulation (BCBSIL) (BCBSMI)
(BCBSCNY)
(BCBSNE)
(CareFirstBCBS)
&
(BCBSAL), are
you ready to get paid
faster and fairer?
From
Aetna's ERISA yesterday (Aetna Video Shows ERISA
Patients Mistreated) to
Aetna's ERISA today
(DOL/ERISA) =
Aetna ERISA
Actions or intention in compliance and in
control.
From
AMA's ERISA
yesterday (The latest Harvard & RAND study)
to
AMA's ERISA today (JAMA Editorial)
=ERISA Actions or Not?
That's why physicians, healthcare
providers and hospitals must
wake up on ERISA
now!
"Forty
states required individuals to first exhaust their health policy’s internal
appeals and grievance process before seeking external review." (GAO,
September 2003, Page 46) The health policy’s internal appeals and
grievance process =
ERISA
appeals 80% of the time.
"Congress
library report", "Minneapolis
memorandum" and "Phoenix
memorandum"
should have been
sufficient
intelligence for
executive
decision-making on
health-care
Oct. 11
fact card.
|
| |
|
For
Physicians and Health-care Providers |
For
Insurance Companies
ERISA Plans/TPAs |
|
ERISA's
Prompt Pay Law, better than State Prompt Pay Laws [29 CFR § 2560.503-1
(f)(i),
Page 70267-9] |
ERISA's
Prompt Pay Law, better than State Prompt Pay Laws
[29 CFR § 2560.503-1 (f)(i), Page 70267-9] |
| |
|
|
New Assignment of Benefit Form Required for
Appeals and Claim Dispute
(DOL
FAQ, B2-B3) |
No New Legal Assignment of Benefit Form, No
Obligations to Physicians and Health-care Service Providers
(DOL
FAQ B2),
otherwise Obligations to Disclose to Both Patients and Providers
(DOL FAQ B-3) |
| |
|
|
No written appeal, no rights, except for claims
involved with urgent care.
[Page 70255 & 70271] |
In claims involved with urgent care,
physicians/health-care providers are to be considered by default as
authorized representatives.
[Page 70255 & 70271] |
| |
|
|
The regulation clarifies for the first time since 1977 and
prohibits anti-assignment provisions in ERISA plans & (footnote 36).
[page 70255 ]
[29 CFR § 2560.503-1 (b) (4) Page 70266] |
Assignments by patients must be absolutely
clear as to what extent and capacity, verifications are permitted &
(footnote 36).
(DOL FAQ B-3)
[page 70255 & 70266]
[29 CFR § 2560.503-1 (b) (4), Page 70266] |
| |
|
|
Must complete required two levels of appeals,
with legal assignment of benefits and specific written request for
disclosure of specific plan documents.
[Page 70253] |
No legal assignment of benefits, no response
required; no specific written request, no disclosure obligated,
however failure to establish and comply with claim procedures,
administrative remedies are considered to be exhausted. Lawsuit may
follow.
[Page 70271] |
| |
|
|
New protections for pre-service claims and
urgent care claims against improper pre-authorization,
pre-certification and utilization review as well as urgent cares.
[Page 70248 & 70271] |
Understanding of differences in pre-service,
urgent care and post-service claims will save big money in fiduciary
breach liability claims and
POSSIBLE
medical malpractice claims. [Page
70248 & 70271] |
| |
|
|
New definitions of relevant documents and
disclosure obligations, no more medical necessity secrets, UCR fee
schedule confidential
[Page 70252]
[29 CFR § 2560.503-1 (h)(2)(iii) (m) (4), Page 70268, 70271]
[DOL FAQ B-5] |
No legal assignment of benefits, no obligation
to disclose to an assignee, assignment verification by the plan is
allowed and protected.
Update SPD and any guidelines, only use disclosable and
qualified medical claim reviewers.
[Page 70252]
[29 CFR § 2560.503-1 (h)(2)(iii) (m) (4), Page 70268, 70271]
[DOL FAQ B-5] |
| |
|
|
A Full and Fair Review with new definitions and
protection requires de novo reviews on two appeals by at least four
different people, two different fiduciaries with ERISA plan, and
two different Health-care professionals independent to the ERISA
plan.
[29 CFR § 2560.503-1 (h) (3)(ii)(iii)(iv)(v), Page 70268-9, (m) (8), Page 70271]
[Page 70252-70253] |
Update
SPDs with New Standards and compliance, specify and designate
only qualified fiduciaries for appeals, establish new complaint
appeal procedures, use only disclosable and licensed as well as
certified health-care professionals for medical reviews,
pre-certification and prior authorizations in every case.
[29 CFR § 2560.503-1 (h) (3)(ii)(iii)(iv)(v), Page 70268-9, (m) (8), Page 70271]
[Page 70252-70253] |
| |
|
|
New clarifications on state law preemptions and
"independent" medical reviews. No preemption for state laws unless
prevention of the application of the new regulation
[Page 70254] |
Comply with both
the regulation and state laws in claims involving mixed
treatment and eligibility determinations and pure medical treatment
decision-makings.
[Page 70254] |
| |
|
|
New clarifications with new definitions claim
denial/an adverse benefit determination (payment<100% claimed)
or Overpayment, and new protections.
(DOL FAQ C-12) |
Overpayment vs. an adverse benefit
determination, recoupment vs. appeal procedures.
(DOL FAQ C-12) |
| |
|
|
SPDs must
describe...... |
No SPDs, No
decision making |
| |
|
|
Insurance company's decision-making power and
disclosure obligations must be described in SPD
[29 CFR 2520.102-3 (q), Page 70242] |
Fully-insured plans with a health insurance
issuer being wholly or partially responsible for administering the
plan (e.g. payment of claims) must describe insurer's role in SPD.
[29 CFR 2520.102-3 (q), Page 70242] |
| |
|
|
Claim fiduciary, whoever makes denial
appeal decisions, has duties to disclose
SPD and relevant document
[29 CFR § 2560.503-1 (h)(2)(iii), (3)(iii) Page 70268-9, (m) (8), Page 70271] or may face up to $110 a day penalty under "Prudent Actions by Plan
Fiduciaries" and "Enforce Your Rights."
[29 CFR § 2520.102-3, Page 70243] |
Claim fiduciaries or plan fiduciaries
have new duties to disclose, without charge,
SPD and relevant
document
[29 CFR § 2560.503-1 (h)(2)(iii), (3)(iii) Page 70268-9, (m) (8), Page 70271] when claim for
benefits is denied or delayed, or may face up to $110 a day penalty
under "Prudent Actions by Plan Fiduciaries" and "Enforce Your
Rights."
[29 CFR § 2520.102-3, Page 70243] |
|
Failure to timely
make benefit determination and review decisions by the plan
administrator will constitute "deemed denied" review/appeal and
"deemed exhaustion of administrative remedy" under
§ 2560.503-1(l), ("a decision on the
merits of the claim" = de novo judicial review, instead of
deferential judicial review) that will forfeit or preclude
the plan from "deferential review standard" on judicial review in
federal court,
the most important part of "ERISA Shield" on ERISA land.
Gilbertson v Allied Signal Inc |
DOL interprets
§
2560.503-1(l) through CFR accompanying supplementary information on
page 70255: “The Department’s intentions in including this
provision in the proposal were to clarify that the procedural
minimums of the regulation are essential to procedural fairness and
that
a
decision made in the absence of the mandated procedural protections
should not be entitled to any judicial
deference.” |
|
More.... |
More.... |
|
And
many more new and
important
provisions and protections for health-care providers and
insurance companies/ERISA plans/TPA's, as well as patients and
employers.
Surprisingly and ironically, under current national health-care crisis for
everyone, most of us, healthcare providers, payers and administrators,
patients and employers, are not ready for this new federal claim regulation,
its meaningful and practical compliance and enforcement may save all of us
from worsening of national health-care crisis.
Don't wait for another 28 years, it's not too late
to take actions to become in compliance for your own benefits and
protections.
Our seminars are
for everyone,
physicians, health-care providers, clinics, hospitals,
insurance companies,
ERISA plans, third party claim administrators and plan sponsors as
well as state insurance regulators.
Only with
understanding of the regulation and other partners and alliances in
our nation's health-care system, our national health-care system will
survive and prosper. |
|
Due to the recent demand
from the
ERISA plans and TPA's, we're pleased to announce
that we also provide educational and consulting services to the ERISA plans,
TPA's and managed care organizations on
New
Federal Claim/ERISA Regulations and
Compliance, however we do not provide any services involving actual claim
dispute or legal advice for any legal matter or disputes.
|
|
Payments Go Under a Microscope (washingtonpost.com)
January 12, 2004
"CareFirst officials said the
audit of 2,800 doctors was
triggered by an earlier examination of several thousand claims
that found 9 of every 10 were
inaccurate. "The doctors, we're not saying we don't
trust them," said Jeff Valentine, a CareFirst spokesman. "But
as President Reagan said a number of years ago: 'Trust, but
verify.' "
"The largest insurer of all, the federal
government, recently estimated that the Medicare program
overpaid doctors, hospitals and other health-care providers by
$11.6 billion in 2002, according to an audit of 128,000
claims. The audit found many providers submitted
insufficient documentation (45 percent),
billed for medically unnecessary
services (22 percent) and used
incorrect codes to describe patient visits (12 percent)."
"A larger audit is
planned this year. "The digging now is much deeper,"
said Leslie V. Norwalk, chief operating officer of the Centers
for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the government agency known
as CMS. "Any dollar overpaid is a dollar too much."
"MAMSI and CareFirst recoup overpayments to
doctors by making deductions from future reimbursements.
Doctors can appeal insurers'
decisions. But, in the end, they usually pay up, doctors
and insurers agree."
|
Forbes.com:
"Roughly one in seven Americans has
no health insurance. That hurts HCA Inc. (nyse:
HCA -
news
-
people), the largest U.S. hospital chain, which
last year wrote off $2.21 billion
of revenue because patients couldn't pay their
bills."
The American Hospital Association (AHA):
"Hospitals today are faced with the challenge of managing their
limited resources, while continuing to deliver the highest standard of care.
According to health care experts, the cost of clinical
denials to individual healthcare organizations averages
$3.3 million
annually. However, many hospitals do not have the resources or the
expertise needed to avoid unpaid days at the end of admissions and lead the
denial-appeals processes."
|
|
|
U.S. Health-care Crisis
& ERISA Criminal Enforcement
ERISAclaim.com - A $1.0 Trillion Nuclear Solution to U.S. Health-care
Crisis & $44 Trillion Budget Deficits
ERISAclaim.com: 50% Savings - Healthcare Crisis Turnaround for
Employers, Insurers & TPA's
ERISAclaim.com - 950,000 MD's Settled With Aetna & Cigna on ERISA
ERISAclaim.com: ERISA Certification Programs
for Cost-Saving & Reimbursement by Compliance
ERISAclaim.com - U.S. Health-care Crisis
& ERISA Criminal Enforcement
DOL +
DOJ Enforcement of
ERISA
 |
& |
 |
HHS Works with
ERISA (+77 Millions/4 Yrs)
|
Denials +
Recoupment =
Inflation +
Fraud or
Cost-Sharing?
Rx =
Compliant Denials & Appeals! |
|
Forbes.com: "Roughly one in seven Americans has
no health insurance. That hurts HCA Inc. (nyse:
HCA -
news
-
people), the largest U.S. hospital chain, which
last year wrote off $2.21 billion
of revenue because patients couldn't pay their
bills."
The American Hospital Association (AHA): "Hospitals today are faced with the challenge of managing their
limited resources, while continuing to deliver the highest standard of care.
According to health care experts, the cost of clinical
denials to individual healthcare organizations averages
$3.3 million
annually. However, many hospitals do not have the resources or the
expertise needed to avoid unpaid days at the end of admissions and lead the
denial-appeals processes."
Payments Go Under a Microscope (washingtonpost.com)
"MAMSI and CareFirst recoup overpayments to doctors by making
deductions from future reimbursements.
Doctors can appeal insurers' decisions.
But, in the end, they usually pay up, doctors and insurers agree."
Hospital Pricing and the Uninsured,
Glenn Melnick, Ph.D.,
"Price
Gouging"
(Subcommittee on Health
Hearing on the Uninsured,
U.S.
FILES COMPLAINT AGAINST NATIONAL ACCOUNTING FIRM UNDER FALSE CLAIMS ACT
(DOJ
Press Release) "January 5, 2004
- PHILADELPHIA –
United States Attorney Patrick L. Meehan announced today the filing of the
Government's
complaint against national accounting firm Ernst & Young.
According to the complaint, nine hospitals paid Ernst & Young for billing
advice – advice which later caused the submission of false claims to the
Medicare program."
USATODAY.com - Hospitals Sock Uninsured with Much Bigger Bills
GM to Report $60B in Future Health-Care Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Codified in Title 29 of the
Code of Federal Regulations:
Regulations
Selected links:
2520.102-3 Contents of summary plan description.
2560.503-1 Claims procedure. |
|
|
 |
|
ERISA Laws/Rules
|
|
|
 |
|
ERISA in US CODE
|
|
|
 |
|
DOL
|
|
|
 |
|
HIPPA Final
|
|
|
 |
|
$10,600 ERISA Claim
|
| Recent Federal Court Ruling in a Case with
$10,600 medical claim, insurance Co. refused to pay, provider
made numerous demand for payment in almost one year, but no
appeals filed, the court dismissed the lawsuit because provider
failed to exhaust administrative remedy, as required under ERISA,
by filing ERISA claim appeals. This situation is so popular
in health-care community.
|
|
 |
|
$37,350 ERISA Claim
|
| Health-care provider alleged medical claims
submitted to Aetna for reimbursement, Aetna asserted no receipt
of medical claims, no written denials. Health-care
provider failed to present proof of claim submission, claim
denial and ERISA claim appeals. This case was dismissed. ERISA
health-care claims are handled in federal court, state law is
generally not applicable.
|
|
 |
|
|
Opinion: Cutting Costs in Half Through Better Management is
Fantasy But Health Care Debate Is Real (The Hartford
Courant)
Excerpt: "If a
talk on economics can have a $650 billion throwaway line,
Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill delivered it.... "
"O'Neill
insists the problem is not with people, but systems - systems
that invite medical errors, systems that penalize health care
professionals for making honest mistakes, systems that create
the mind-numbing complexity of reimbursement for providers,
systems that reward too much treatment and punish efficiency." |
|
 |
|
ctnow.com
|
|
Health
Cost Trends Shift
"The study said managed care probably has squeezed out all the
savings it can from the nation's health care system and that
employers are turning to other familiar devices such as
increasing premiums and co-payments to trim their costs" |
|
 |
|
|
Employer Health Benefits: 2002 Annual Survey.(pdf)
Accessibility verified January 30, 2003
(KaiserNetwork.org) |

|
|
|
GAO
Report: Improvements to Retirement Income Data Needed
(U.S. General Accounting Office)
"What GAO Recommends:
The Congress should consider
directing Labor to obtain from plan administrators
electronic filings of SPDs and summaries of material
modifications and make them
publicly available." |
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|

FDA > CDRH >
Database Super Search
"Device Listing Database
Proprietary Device Name:
MASSAGER ( THERAPUTIC, ELECTRIC,
WATER
Common/Generic Device Name:
ASOOTHE/AQUAMED
Classification Name:
MASSAGER, THERAPEUTIC, ELECTRIC
Device
Class:
1
Product Code:
ISA
Regulation Number:
890.5660
Medical Specialty:
Physical Medicine"
Categorization of
Investigational Devices
"... all FDA-approved IDE's
into either Category A (experimental
/ investigational) or
Category
B (nonexperimental/
investigational). An
experimental /
investigational ..."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Agree to terms and conditions
"Each
benefit plan defines which services are covered, which are
excluded, and which are subject to dollar caps or other limits.
Members and their providers will need to consult the member's
benefit plan to determine if there are any exclusions or other
benefit limitations applicable to this service or supply."
CIGNA - Coverage Positions/Criteria
"The terms of a participant's particular benefit
plan document [Group Service Agreement (GSA), Evidence of
Coverage, Certificate of Coverage,
Summary Plan Description (SPD) or similar plan
document] may differ significantly from the standard benefit
plans upon which these Coverage Positions are based.
If
these Coverage Positions are inconsistent with the terms of the
member's specific benefit plan, then the terms of the member's
specific benefit plan always control."
UnitedHealthcare Medical Policies
"By clicking "I agree," you agree to be bound by
the terms and conditions expressed below, in addition to our
Site Use Agreement.
UnitedHealthcare medical policies have been made available to
you as a general reference resource. When reading these policies
you agree that:
Our Medical Policy is not your patient's Benefit Plan.
Your patient's medical
benefits are governed and determined by a benefit document,
either a Certificate of Coverage or a
Summary Plan Description. You should not rely on
the information contained in this Web site section to determine
your patient's medical benefits.
-
Federal and state mandates and the patient’s
benefit document take precedence over these policies.
-
The patient’s benefit document lists the specific
services that have coverage limits or exclusions.
Our Medical Policy does not address every situation and
individuals should always consult their physician before making
any decisions on medical care."
|
|
 |
|
|