|
|
|
|
U.S. Health-care Crisis
& ERISA Criminal Enforcement
Are All
Consultants Corrupt? (Fast Company)
|
Hearing, Senate Committee on Finance,
3-3-04
View Video
or
Transcript
(PDF)
(KaiserNetwork.org)
[Ann
Combs: "No, the results are not good.
It’s a tragedy."]
"In one settled case, the district court judge had to order the
US Attorney’s office to open a criminal investigation,
investigation based on evidence he saw in a private civil case
where there was evidence of money laundering, fraud, health care
fraud, wire fraud, also sorts of RICO violations, a federal
judge had to order the justice department to investigate. That’s
a big problem."
Mila Kofman, Georgetown University
|
|
Health-Care 9/11 Report of 2005
Health-care WMD
by Jin Zhou,
02/05/2005
© 2005,
Jin Zhou,
ERISAclaim.com |
|
Unanimous US Supreme Court: |
Employer-Sponsored Health-Care Is
Completely Governed by ERISA laws and rules;
Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila, 06/21/04 |
|
Congressional Leaders: |
One
Administration = One Voice = ERISA Self Enforcement only, or
No Enforcement? |
|
Health-care Terrorists? |
"ERISA Advantage" bogus
plans,
"unlimited and frequent premium increases, and the potential for
rampant fraud with little, if any, regulatory recourse" in 30
years of ERISA self enforcement. |
|
Health-care WMD (Weapons of Mass Destruction) |
"Medical
Inflation, WMD" for
"ERISA Advantage" from
ERISA Failure -
"Failure of Imagination" Again
for US Healthcare:
USA:
$1.9 Trillion, 15.7% of GDP
GM:
$5.6 Billion, $1,500 Per Car
Economists: Federal deficit a bigger risk than terrorism (USA
Today) "The survey, taken
between Feb. 28 and March 8, found U.S. businesses had three nearly
equal concerns about longer-term risks: health care, the aging
population and the federal deficit." |
|
USA
2005: |
-
Personal Bankruptcy
-
GM Chapter 11,
-
National healthcare expenditure $$1,9 trillion
-
One nation under debt
-
GAO Report: Tax
Expenditures Represent a Substantial Federal Commitment and Need to
Be Reexamined (PDF) (U.S. Government Accountability Office)
Abstract Highlights-PDF PDF
|
|
White
House Rx: |
$1,000
HSA personal responsibility +AHP with
More "ERISA advantage" for
"widespread
plan insolvencies and fraud" and
"A
Prescription For Disaster". |
|
2005 for
Michael Moore? |
"John Q. ERISA
Enforcement"??? |
|
Congressional conclusion 2008:
|
"Failure of Imagination" Again,
with No One's Responsibility and Accountability. |
Title 29 U.S.C. § 1141 states:
"It shall be unlawful for any
person through the use of fraud, force, violence, or threat of
the use of force or violence, to restrain, coerce, intimidate,
or attempt to restrain, coerce, or intimidate any participant or
beneficiary for the purpose of interfering with or preventing
the exercise of any right to which he is or may become entitled
under the plan, this title, section 3001, or the Welfare and
Pension Plans Disclosure Act. Any person who willfully violates
this section shall be fined $10,000 or imprisoned for not more
than one year, or both. The amount of fine is governed by 18
U.S.C. § 3571. The U.S. Sentencing Guidelines address 29 U.S.C.
§ 1141 under the guidelines for "Fraud and Deceit" (U.S.S.G. §
2F1.1) or for "Extortion by Force or Threat of Injury or Serious
Damage (U.S.S.G. § 2B3.2)......"
"For example, Section 1141
would reach the use of deception directed
at misleading a welfare plan beneficiary as to the amount of
health benefits owed to the beneficiary under the terms of the
plan or at misleading a pension plan participant as to
the amount of retirement benefits to which he would become
entitled under the plan upon his retirement."
ERISA in the United States Code
|
"Failure of Imagination" Again?
"John Q.
ERISA
Enforcement"
Release Date: 10/21/2004
"EBSA closed 4,399 civil investigations in
FY 2004. Nearly 70% of those investigations resulted in correction
of violations under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
(ERISA). Criminal investigations led to
the indictment of 121 individuals. In addition, EBSA received a
record 474 applications to participate in its compliance assistance
program to help employers and plan officials to voluntarily correct
specific violations of the law."
EBSA Achieves Record $3.1 Billion in Fiscal Year 2004
Results •
Press Release
Spitzer's Latest Target (yahoo.businessweek.com)
"New York's Attorney General now has employee-benefits
insurers in his sights. A federal probe could be next
... WASHINGTON, TOO? "We found that favoritism,
secrecy, and conflicts rule this market, and not open
competition," said Spitzer in testimony about the insurance ..."
U.S. Senate Committee on
Governmental Affairs:
"Oversight
Hearing on Insurance Brokerage Practices, Including Potential Conflicts of
Interest and the Adequacy of the Current Regulatory Framework."
Date: 11/16/04
From 03-03-2004 to
05-10-2004 to 09-30-2004
Why Bogus Plans Called "ERISA Advantage"???
Because There is An Advantage of None or Little/Late Enforcement of
ERISA
Man Sentenced
to Prison in Nationwide Health Insurance Scheme (Axcess News)
Excerpt: "In pleading guilty, [John B.] Hyde
admitted that he was president of ISI which operated in Novato
[California]. ISI marketed and sold a health plan known as the ERISA
Employee Health Benefit Plan or the ERISA
Advantage. The health plan was marketed and sold to thousands
of people throughout the country who believed that they were covered
by a legitimate health plan."
|
Three people arrested for health insurance fraud
(News-Medical.net,
Tuesday, 11-May-2004)
"Three people were arrested
this morning for allegedly orchestrating a scheme to defraud
the customers of Employers Mutual LLC, a company that
purported to provide health care coverage to more than 20,000
people across the United States, but left more than $30
million in unpaid claims for medical services when it was shut
down."
"Deputy Attorney General
James B. Comey stated: “The Department of Justice is committed
to the prosecution of individuals who operate bogus health
insurance schemes. These schemes victimize the employees,
individuals and families who believed they had health care
coverage but are left uninsured with devastating personal
liability for unpaid medical claims.”
"One of the Department of
Labor's highest priorities is to protect the benefits of
workers and their families,” said Ann L. Combs, Assistant
Secretary of Labor for Employee Benefits Security. “These
corrupt individuals took advantage of the trust that small
businesses and their workers placed in them to provide
health benefits. Today's indictments demonstrate our
commitment to vigorously pursue those who prey on people
seeking affordable health coverage for themselves and their
families and ensure that they are prosecuted to the fullest
extent of the law."
Canyon Lake couple arrested after federal indictment
(North County Times)
U.S. Department of Justice
September
30, 2004
FORMER PRESIDENT OF INTERSTATE SERVICES
INCORPORATED PLEADS GUILTY TO HEALTH CARE FRAUD
"ERISA Advantage"
|
ERISAclaim.com - A $1.0 Trillion Nuclear Solution to U.S. Health-care
Crisis & $44 Trillion Budget Deficits
ERISAclaim.com: 50% Savings - Healthcare Crisis Turnaround for
Employers, Insurers & TPA's
ERISAclaim.com - 950,000 MD's Settled With Aetna & Cigna on ERISA
ERISAclaim.com: ERISA Certification Programs
for Cost-Saving & Reimbursement by Compliance
DOL +
DOJ Enforcement of
ERISA
 |
& |
 |
HHS Works with
ERISA (+77 Millions/4 Yrs)
|
|
New
Federal Claim Regulation (Final Rule)
Benefit Claims Procedure Regulation
(FAQ)
Amendments to Summary Plan Description
Regulations
(Final Rule)
Patient's
Rights Claims Procedure Regulation (Fact
Sheet)
What You Should Know about Filing Your Health Benefits Claim
|
What You Should Know
about Filing Your Health Benefits Claim
(DOL Claims Card)
|
|
|
|
"If you are an
employee or family member of an employee who receives
health benefits from a health
plan provided through employment in the
private sector, a federal law, the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act (ERISA),
protects you. Among the
protections, ERISA sets standards for administering these
plans. Those standards require plans to give you important
information about the plan and to have a fair process for
handling benefit claims. |
|
Below are steps you
should take to file a benefit
claim and what to do if your claim is denied.
It is especially important to know your rights under
your plan and the law if your benefit claim is denied.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
first step you should take -
even before you are ready to file a benefit claim - is
to carefully read your plan's summary
plan description. This is a document which your plan
administrator must furnish to you after you join the plan. You
can also request a copy from your plan administrator.
The SPD gives you a detailed summary of
your plan - - how it works, what benefits it provides,
and how they may be obtained (the process for filing your
claim). The summary plan description is
also required to describe your rights and protections under
ERISA."
More...
What You Should Know about Filing Your Health Benefits Claim |
29CFR2520.102-3 - Contents of Summary Plan Description.
"(q) The identity of any
funding medium used for the accumulation of assets through which
benefits are provided. The summary plan description shall identify
any insurance company, trust fund, or any other institution,
organization, or entity which maintains a fund on behalf of the
plan or through which the plan is funded or benefits are provided.
If a health insurance issuer,
within the meaning of section 733(b)(2) of the Act, is
responsible, in whole or in part, for
the financing or administration of a group health plan, the
summary plan description shall indicate the name and address of
the issuer, whether and to what extent benefits under the plan are
guaranteed under a contract or policy of insurance issued by the
issuer, and the nature of any administrative services (e.g.,
payment of claims) provided by the issuer."
Supreme Court Watch: (Rush) "It is, in fact, the Plan
Administrator" (footnote 3) (ERISAclaim.com)
|
|
What If
DOL Administrative Enforcement
Didn't Work For You?
[rules
to be "self-enforcing"]
Policy &
Leadership
[Ann Combs:
"No the results are not good.
It’s a
tragedy."]
Are All
Consultants Corrupt? (Fast Company)
Excerpt: "That's one possible conclusion in the wake of the
Enron scandal.
According to David Maister, who's been studying professional-services firms
for more than 20 years, it's time to clear the air."
Rx-1
$$$$$$$$$ERISA $$$$$$$$$$
Rx-2
Subcommittee on Health
Hearing on the Uninsured,
Testimony of
Greg Scandlen,
Director, Center for Consumer Driven Health Care, Galen Institute
"But third-party payment is not the ultimate
cause, either. Our system of third-party payment is the direct
result of many decades of well-intentioned, but short-sighted
and ultimately misguided state and federal policies. These
policies have had far-reaching and negative consequences that
were unforeseen (but not unforeseeable) when they were enacted.
I will deal today with two – federal tax
policy and ERISA – but these are
only two of the more prominent examples. Other federal laws that
have contributed to the problems we face include the Hill-Burton
Act of 1946, the McCarran-Ferguson Act of 1947, price controls
in the early 1970s, the HMO Act of 1973, the Health Planning Act
of 1974, various aspects of Medicare and Medicaid, COBRA, HIPAA,
and a range of state and federal mandates."
"Health
Insurance Challenges: Buyer Beware"
3-3-04
To
view this hearing click
Hearing, Senate Committee on Finance,
3-3-04
GAO-04-312:
“Employers and Individuals Are Vulnerable to Unauthorized or Bogus Entities
Selling Health Benefits”
Snowe Shocked by Growth in Bogus Health Insurance
Plans Targeting Desperate Small Business Owners
March 3, 2004 (Senate
Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship)
"Snowe called operators of such fraudulent plans “masters” at playing an
intricate insurance shell game. “They know how to stay one step ahead of the
enforcement authorities by characterizing their operations as just beyond
the reach of that authority,” Snowe said. “If a state
pursues them, they will claim that they are federally regulated. If the
federal government comes after them, they will say that they are a state
regulated insurance company.”
Kaiser Family Foundation Provides Transcript of Hearing on
Unregulated Health Insurance Schemes (PDF)
(KaiserNetwork.org)
61 pages. Entitled 'Health Insurance Challenges: Buyer Beware,' the
hearing was held by the Senate Finance Committee on
March 3, 2004. Witnesses: The wife of an unauthorized health
insurance plan victim; Kathryn Allen, GAO; Robert Cramer, GAO;
Ann Combs, DOL; Fred Nepple, NAIC ( National Assn. of Insurance
Commissioners); Jose Montemayor, TDI (Texas Department of Insurance);
and Mila Kofman, Georgetown University.
"Ann Combs: Well, again, and I’m, our hook here
is ERISA. So, we’re not the agency that
enforces licenser."
"Ann
combs: It’s a frustrating situation, it is. I don’t mean to argue
with you.
Senator Thomas: I’m not going to argue either, I’m just saying
you went through all the good things you’re doing but
the results are not good.
Ann
Combs: No the results are not good. It’s a
tragedy."
"Senator Thomas: Ms. Kofman, do you have any other
suggestions other than that in terms of resolving the problem?
Mila Kofman: Ya, I think there’s a perception out there
that the justice department is not prosecuting these cases and I think there
is good reason for that perception because we have not seen any criminal
indictments on these current operators. So one of the suggestions I have for
you is to ask the justice department why they’re not going forward with
these cases. In one settled case, the district
court judge had to order the US Attorney’s office to open a criminal
investigation, investigation based on evidence he saw in a private civil
case where there was evidence of money laundering, fraud, health care fraud,
wire fraud, also sorts of RICO violations, a federal judge had to order the
justice department to investigate. That’s a big problem."
Written Testimony
of GAO on Health Insurance Scams (U.S. General Accounting Office)
EBSA News Release: Labor Department Official Testifies Before Senate Finance
on Health Insurance Scams [03/03/2004]
Testimony of Assistant Secretary Ann L. Combs Before the Senate Finance
Committee [03/03/2004]
Testimony of Fred
Nepple Before the Senate Finance
Committee [03/03/2004]
Chair of ERISA Working Group, National Association of Insurance, Austin, TX
"Types of Unauthorized Plans
All the unauthorized health plans discussed in the
GAO report have two factors in common.
They all offer a plan that claims to provide
employee benefits subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974 (ERISA), and they all claim to be exempt from state
insurance regulation under ERISA. Unauthorized health plans
take several different forms. They typically claim to be unions,
business associations, professional associations, out-of-state trusts,
single-employer plans, or some combination."
Fake Insurance Leaves Millions in Bills Unpaid (MedlinePlus,
nih.gov)
Fake Insurance Leaves Millions in Bills Unpaid
(Reuters, United States - Mar
3, 2004)
"WASHINGTON (Reuters Health) - More than 15,000 employers bought 144
separate bogus health insurance plans that left an estimated 200,000
policyholders with at least $252 million in unpaid
claims between 2000 and 2002, the General Accounting Office told a U.S.
Senate Committee Wednesday."
"A key problem with catching operators of
health insurance scams, testified Texas Insurance Commissioner Jose
Montemayor, is that many plans manage to avoid state officials by
claiming to be exempt under the Federal Employee
Retirement Income Security Act, ERISA."
"Mila Kofman, an assistant research professor from Georgetown University,
said another problem is
that the U.S. Justice Department has not been active enough. "Civil
actions do not stop those who engage in criminal conduct," she testified.
"They change their name, move to another state and repeat the scam.
What is necessary are criminal actions that result in
a jail sentence," she told the committee."
NUMBER of bogus health insurance issuers proliferating (Los
Angeles Daily News)
"The federal government regulates most private employer-sponsored pension
and benefit plans as required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974. But the GAO says that under ERISA,
self-funded employer group health plans are not subject to state oversight,
increasing the probability of illicit activity.
Flanagan said until there is more regulation and
consumer education in the industry, these loopholes are likely to
stir more trouble for employers and individuals seeking affordable health
insurance."
The Illusion of Group Health Insurance: Discretionary Associations
(Families USA)
18 pages issue brief. Excerpt: "This segment of the health insurance market
continues to grow as people who lose their traditional employer based
insurance seek low-cost alternatives that seem to promise group protections.
It is also a reflection of the spotty and largely inadequate regulatory
system that is supposed to oversee this sector of the market."
Fact Sheet: Affordable Health Care for America's Families -
Whitehouse.gov (press release)
Bush makes fresh pitch for health care remedies, tax cuts (AP
through San Francisco Chronicle)
|
|
How
Does ERISA Protect You?
[Ann
Combs: "No the results are not good.
It’s a tragedy."]
In addition to
Labor
Department (DOL)
Administrative Enforncement of ERISA,
Department of Justice, through FBI, Investigates and Enforces
ERISA against Any Criminal Violations:
"By a
Memorandum of Understanding dated February 9, 1975, between
the Secretary of Labor and the Attorney General, criminal
matters arising under 18 U.S.C. § 1027 are investigated by the
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The Memorandum permits
different arrangements to be made by the Department of Justice
and Department of Labor on a case-by-case basis." (Criminal
Resource Manual 2435 Investigative Jurisdiction -- 18 U.S.C.
1027)
29CFR2520.102-3 - Contents of Summary Plan Description.
Reporting by Multiple Employer Welfare Arrangements and Certain
Other Entities that Offer or Provide Coverage for Medical Care
to the Employees of Two or More Employers [Rules and
Regulations] [04/09/2003] |
[PDF Version]
§ 2520.101–2 (b)(3): b) Definitions. As
used in this section, the following definitions apply:
Administrator
means--"(3) In the case of a MEWA or ECE for which
an administrator is not designated
and a plan sponsor cannot be identified,
jointly and severally the person or
persons actually responsible (whether
or not so designated under the terms of the instrument
under which the MEWA or ECE is operated)
for the control, disposition, or management of the cash or
property received by or contributed to the MEWA or ECE,
irrespective of whether such control, disposition, or
management is exercised directly by such person or persons
or indirectly through an agent,
custodian, or trustee designated by such person or persons."
Supreme Court Watch: (Rush) "It is, in fact, the Plan
Administrator" (footnote 3)
(ERISAclaim.com)
"Discretionary
Clause" >>
"Discretionary Spending"
>>
"Discretionary
Medical Inflation" >> "Discretionary
Insurance Robbery"
>>
Discretionary
Medical Killing >> "Discretionary
Universally Uninsured" >> "Discretionary
Jurisdiction Non-enforcement" >>
U.S. Healthcare Crisis!
Licensing of ERISA-Covered Benefit Plan Administrator,
New York State Insurance Department, January 26,
2000
HMOs Earn $10.2 Billion in 2003,
Nearly Doubling Profits, According to Weiss Ratings; Blue Cross Blue Shield
Plans Report 63% Jump in Earnings
(BUSINESS WIRE)--Aug. 30, 2004
Letter opinion per CIC §12921.9 : Discretionary Clauses,
(PDF)
John Garamendi, Insurance
Commissioner,
DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, February 26, 2004
|
 |
What's New |
|
|
|
Department
of Justice
Criminal
Resource Manual
(ERISA)
(Please click on the hyperlinks to view the official DOJ web &
documents)
|
|
Department of Justice >
USAM >
Title 9 >
Criminal Resource Manual |
2401 |
-
29 U.S.C. § 501(c) -- Embezzlement and Theft From
Labor Unions in the Private Sector; 18 U.S.C. § 664 --
Embezzlement and Theft From Employee Benefit Plans in the Private
Sector
-
Investigative Jurisdiction -- 29 U.S.C. § 501(c)
and 18 U.S.C. § 664
-
Form Indictment -- Embezzlement and Theft of Labor
Union Assets in the Private Sector -- (29 U.S.C. § 501(c))
-
Form Indictment -- Embezzlement and Theft From an
Employee Pension or Welfare Benefit Plans or a Fund Connected With
Such Plans -- (18 U.S.C. § 664)
-
29 U.S.C. 501(c) Decisions
-
18 U.S.C. § 664 Decisions
-
Employee Benefit Plan Kickbacks -- 18 U.S.C. § 1954
-
Investigative Jurisdiction
-
Bribery and Graft Affecting Employee Benefit Plans
-- 18 U.S.C. § 1954
-
Form Indictment -- Solicitation and Receipt of
Bribery and Graft Affecting Employee Pension or Welfare Plan in
the Private Sector -- (18 U.S.C. § 1954)
-
Form Indictment -- Offer and Gift of Bribery and
Graft Payments Affecting Employee Pension or Welfare Plan in the
Private Sector -- (18 U.S.C. § 1954)
-
Employee Benefit Plan Kickbacks --
(18 U.S.C. § 1954)
-
Decisions Involving 18 U.S.C. § 1954
-
Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974 (ERISA) -- 29 U.S.C.§§ 1001 et seq.
-
Investigative Jurisdiction
-
Failure to Perform ERISA Reporting
and Disclosure -- 29 U.S.C. § 1131 (ERISA Section 501)
-
Elements of Proof for 29 U.S.C. §
1131 and ERISA Obligations
-
Form Indictment -- 29 U.S.C. § 1131
-
Coercive or Fraudulent Interference
with ERISA Rights -- 29 U.S.C. § 1141
-
Form Indictment -- 29 U.S.C. § 1141
-
Investigative Jurisdiction -- 29
U.S.C. § 439
-
Investigative Jurisdiction -- 18
U.S.C. § 1027
-
Form Indictment -- Falsification of
Annual Financial Report Filed by Labor Union in the Private Sector
(29 U.S.C. § 439(b))
-
Form Indictment -- Falsification,
Concealment or Destruction of Financial Records Required to be
Kept by Labor Union in the Private Sector (29 U.S.C. § 439(c))
-
Form Indictment -- False Statements
and Concealment of Facts in Employee Benefit Plan Records or
Reports
-
Decisions Related to 18 U.S.C. § 1027
|
| |
If enforced as
intended by Congress, ERISA could be the best protection for
employee benefits plans, Rx for US health care crisis.
Jin Zhou, March 2005
|
| |
|
Title 29 U.S.C. § 1131 states:
Any person who willfully
violates any provision of part 1 (Reporting and Disclosure) of
this subtitle (Subtitle B-Regulatory Provisions of ERISA), or any
regulation or order issued under any such provision, shall upon
conviction be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more
than one year, or both; except that in the case of such violation
by a person not an individual, the fine imposed upon such person
shall be a fine not exceeding $100,000. [The amount of the fine is
governed by 18 U.S.C ?.]
The gravamen of offense is
the willful omission to perform reporting or disclosure required by
ERISA. Falsification of required ERISA documents (records, reports,
and certified information) is punishable as a felony at 18 U.S.C. §
1027. See 9-136.000. Caveat: Breach of fiduciary duty
in Title I of ERISA without more is not a crime.
|
|
October 1997 |
Criminal Resource
Manual 2429 |
|
(18 U.S.C. § 1027)
The Grand Jury Charges:
That from on or
about (date) in the __________ District of ___________, in
[a] document[s] required by Title I of the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA") to be [kept as part of the
records* of][certified to the administrator** of] (name of
employee welfare or pension plan) , an [employee welfare benefit
plan][employee pension benefit plan], the defendant ____________
did make false statement(s) and
representation(s) of fact, knowing the same to be false, and did
knowingly conceal, cover up and fail to disclose facts, [the
disclosure of which was required by ERISA] [which were necessary to
verify, explain, clarify and check for accuracy and completeness]
the (name of required report or information document) , [a
report required by ERISA to be published***][information required by
ERISA to be certified to the administrator], that is, (describe
false entry made, facts knowingly concealed, etc.) .
All in violation of
Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1027 and 2.
* See 29 U.S.C. § 1027
concerning the retention of required records.
** See 29 U.S.C. §§
1023(a)(2) concerning the certification of
information by insurance carriers, banks, organizations providing
plan benefits or holding plan assets, and sponsoring employers and
employee organizations.
*** See 29 U.S.C. §§ 1024(b)
concerning the plan administrator's publication of annual financial
reports of the plan [Form 5500 series], which are filed with the
Secretary of Labor via the Internal Revenue Service, and plan
descriptions.
|
|
October 1997 |
Criminal Resource
Manual 2438 |
|
By a Memorandum of
Understanding dated February 9, 1975, between the Secretary of Labor
and the Attorney General, criminal matters arising under 18 U.S.C. §
1027 are investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
The Memorandum permits different arrangements to be made by the
Department of Justice and Department of Labor on a case-by-case
basis.
However, effective
October 12, 1984, the Department of Labor may also investigate
criminal violations related to the regulation of employee pension
and welfare plans which are subject to Title I of the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act (29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 to 1169) without
further delegation of investigative authority by the Department.
See 29 U.S.C. § 1136, as amended by the Comprehensive Crime
Control Act of 1984, Sec. 805; 98 Stat. 2134-35. Therefore,
Department of Labor investigators now have the express statutory
authority to investigate violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1027. Because the
FBI and the Department of Labor have concurrent jurisdiction in
these cases, each investigative agency should notify the appropriate
United States Attorney's Office at the earliest possible stage of an
investigation. Such investigations should be closely monitored to
avoid duplication of investigative effort.
|
|
October 1997 |
Criminal Resource
Manual 2435 |
|
The following materials have been prepared in part by the
Labor-Management Unit of the Organized Crime and Racketeering
Section (202) 514-3666 and published in Criminal Case
Prosecutions Involving Employee Benefit Plans: Prosecutor's Guide
(United States Department of Labor, Pension and Welfare Benefits
Administration, 1994).
In
order to establish a violation of 29 U.S.C. § 1131, the government
must allege and prove the following essential elements:
-
The
jurisdictional entity involved is an employee benefit plan within
the meaning of Title I of ERISA (29 U.S.C § 1001 et seq.)
-
The violator
had an obligation pursuant to ERISA.
Under section
1131, "any person," refers to a person who has an obligation to
comply with the reporting and disclosure provisions of part I, Title
I of ERISA (29 U.S.C. § 1021). Generally, the person who has such an
obligation is the "administrator," who is the person specifically
designated in the plan documents, or if not designated, the
administrator would be the sponsoring employer or employee
organization or both (plan sponsor). The terms "administrator" and
"plan sponsor" are defined in section 3(16) (29 U.S.C. § 1002 (16)).
Also included, are persons required to certify information, such as
an insurance carrier or bank, as specified in section 103 (29 U.S.C.
§ 1023).
-
The defendant
willfully violated Title I, Part I, ERISA.
Section 1131
punishes anyone who "willfully violates" a statutory reporting or
disclosure requirement in ERISA or regulation or order issued under
those statutory provisions. In United States v. Phillips, 19
F.3d 1565 (11th Cir. 1994), aff'd sub nom.
USX Corp. v. United States, 115 S.Ct. 1312 (1995), the corporate
sponsor of an employee pension plan was convicted of having
willfully caused the plan administrator not to furnish plan
participants with a summary description of a material modification
in the terms of the plan as required by ERISA, namely, changes in
the rules of eligibility for pension credits due former corporate
employees who had become labor representatives.
On appeal the defendant challenged the court's instruction to the
jury that it need only find that the defendant had "knowingly and
intentionally committed the acts which [violated Part 1 of ERISA]
and . . . were not committed accidentally or by some mistake."
Id.
at 1583. Rejecting the defendant's claim that the jury should have
been instructed that section 1131 requires a "specific intent to do
something the law forbids; that is with bad purpose to disobey or
disregard the law," the court upheld the trial court's instruction
that section 1131 requires only a general intent and knowledge of
one's acts. In construing section 1131, the court in Phillips
reasoned that the ERISA misdemeanor does not require proof of a
specific intent to violate the law because the statutory defense
codified at 29 U.S.C. § 1028, based on good faith compliance with
Department of Labor regulations, would be redundant if "willfully"
required such specific intent and would, in effect, render the
"willfully" in section 1131 "meaningless surplusage."
Id. at 1584.
See
also United States v. Tolkow, 532 F.2d 853 (2d Cir.
1976), upholding the conviction of a plan trustee for having
"knowingly" failed to report required party-in-interest transactions
in the plan's annual financial report under ERISA's predecessor, the
Welfare and Pension Plans Disclosure Act, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
§ 1027. Rejecting the assertion that section 1027 required proof of
a specific intent to violate the law and actual knowledge of the
reporting obligations, the court in Tolkow held that the
defendant need only have a reckless disregard of whether he was
violating the reporting obligation by failing to make any
disclosure.
Id.
857-59 and cases cited therein.
REPORTING, DISCLOSURE, AND
RECORDKEEPING OBLIGATIONS
DOCUMENTS
REQUIRED TO BE FILED
Documents that
an ERISA plan administrator is required to file include:
·
A plan
description;
·
A summary plan
description;
·
Modifications
and changes to the plan; and
·
An annual
financial report, terminal and supplementary reports as required.
DOCUMENTS
SUBJECT TO DISCLOSURE
Documents that an ERISA plan administrator is required to disclose
include:
·
A summary plan
description;
·
Modifications
and changes to the plan;
·
A summary
annual report;
·
A statement of
accrued and vested benefits;
·
The latest
Annual Report (Form 5500 series); and
·
Documents under
which an employee benefit plan is established or operated (i.e.,
plan document and any trust agreement).
Documents which must be disclosed on request, including a
statement of accrued and vested benefits, the latest Annual Report
(Form 5500), and the Plan Document.
RECORD RETENTION
Section 107 (29 U.S.C. § 1027) states that:
"every person subject to a
requirement to file any description or report or to certify any
information...shall maintain records on the matters of which
disclosure is required WHICH WILL PROVIDE IN SUFFICIENT DETAIL
THE NECESSARY BASIC INFORMATION AND DATA FROM WHICH THE
DOCUMENTS THUS REQUIRED MAY BE VERIFIED, EXPLAINED, OR
CLARIFIED, AND CHECKED FOR ACCURACY AND COMPLETENESS, AND SHALL
INCLUDE VOUCHERS, WORKSHEETS, RECEIPTS, AND APPLICABLE
RESOLUTIONS, and shall keep such records available for
examination for a period of not less than six years after
the filing date of the documents based on the information which
they contain, or six years after the date on which such
documents would have been filed but for an exemption..."
EXEMPTIONS FROM REPORTING AND
DISCLOSURE
The following plans are exempt from ERISA's Reporting and
Disclosure requirements:
Any employee welfare plan which covers fewer than
100 participants at the beginning of the plan year;
Any employee pension or welfare plan whose benefits are provided
solely from the general assets of the employeror employee
organization maintaining the plan;
Any employee pension or welfare plan whose benefits are provided
exclusively through insurance contracts or policies issued by an
insurance company, provided that any contributions made by the
employees are forwarded to the insurance company within three
months;
Any employee welfare plan which is an apprenticeship plan that
exclusively provides apprenticeship training benefits provided:
-
that the
administrator files certain information with the Secretary
of Labor;
-
ensures
that the information required to be contained in such notice
to the Secretary of Labor is also disclosed to employees of
employers contributing to the plan who may be eligible to
enroll in any course of study sponsored or established by
the plan; and
-
makes the
above information available to employees upon request; or
Any employee welfare benefit
plan which provides for day care centers.
EXAMPLES OF VIOLATIONS
Omission or
refusal to file with Labor Department annual financial reports (5500
series), plan description, summary plan description (29 U.S.C. §
1024);
Omission or
refusal to publish summary plan descriptions to participants (29
U.S.C. § 1024);
Omission or
refusal to furnish information concerning benefits to pension plan
participants (29 U.S.C. § 1025);
or,
Failure to
maintain records from which reports and other required documents can
be verified and checked (29 U.S.C. § 1027).
|
|
October 1997 |
Criminal Resource
Manual 2430 |
|
Title 29 U.S.C. §
1141 states:
It shall be
unlawful for any person through the use of fraud, force, violence,
or threat of the use of force or violence, to restrain, coerce,
intimidate, or attempt to restrain, coerce, or intimidate any
participant or beneficiary for the purpose of interfering with or
preventing the exercise of any right to which he is or may become
entitled under the plan, this title, section 3001, or the Welfare
and Pension Plans Disclosure Act. Any person who willfully violates
this section shall be fined $10,000 or imprisoned for not more than
one year, or both. The amount of fine is governed by 18 U.S.C. §
3571. The U.S. Sentencing Guidelines address 29 U.S.C. § 1141 under
the guidelines for "Fraud and Deceit" (U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1) or for
"Extortion by Force or Threat of Injury or Serious Damage (U.S.S.G.
§ 2B3.2).
In order to
establish a violation of 29 U.S.C. § 1141, the government must
allege and prove the following essential elements:
1.
The
jurisdictional entity involved is an employee benefit plan within
the meaning of title I of ERISA (29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et. seq.).
Employee benefit
plan is defined as an employee pension benefit plan or an employee
welfare benefit plan. 29 U.S.C. § 1002(1), (2), and (3).
2.
The
victim is a participant or beneficiary as defined in the statute.
"Participant" and "Beneficiary" are defined at 3(7) and 3(8)(29
U.S.C. § 1002).
3.
The violator can be any person who uses fraud,
force, violence, or threats of force or violence.
4.
The
violator restrained, coerced, or intimidated, or attempted to
restrain, coerce, or intimidate, a participant or beneficiary for
purposes of interfering with their protected rights.
5.
Protected rights
include any right to which a participant or beneficiary is or may
become entitled to under the plan, Title I of ERISA, 29 U.S.C.§ 1201
(relating to tax qualification of the plan), or the WPPDA
(predecessor statute to ERISA).
6.
The
violator acted WILLFULLY.
For example,
Section 1141 would reach the use of deception directed at misleading
a welfare plan beneficiary as to the amount of health benefits owed
to the beneficiary under the terms of the plan or at misleading a
pension plan participant as to the amount of retirement benefits to
which he would become entitled under the plan upon his retirement.
|
|
October 1997 |
Criminal Resource
Manual 2432 |
|
U.S. Health-care Crisis
& ERISA Criminal Enforcement
ERISAclaim.com - A $1.0 Trillion Nuclear Solution to U.S.
Health-care Crisis & $44 Trillion Budget Deficits
ERISAclaim.com: 50% Savings - Healthcare Crisis Turnaround for
Employers, Insurers & TPA's
ERISAclaim.com - 950,000 MD's Settled With Aetna & Cigna on ERISA
ERISAclaim.com: ERISA Certification Programs
for Cost-Saving & Reimbursement by Compliance
ERISAclaim.com - U.S. Health-care Crisis
& ERISA Criminal Enforcement
DOL +
DOJ Enforcement of
ERISA
 |
& |
 |
HHS Works with
ERISA (+77 Millions/4 Yrs)
|
|

2004.02.19: Text of Letter From Tommy G. Thompson Secretary of
Health and Human Services To Richard J. Davidson, President,
American Hospital Association.
HHS FAQ "Questions On Charges For The Uninsured" (PDF)
HHS FAQ's "regarding offering discounts to
the uninsured" (PDF)
OIG
"HOSPITAL DISCOUNTS OFFERED TO
PATIENTS WHO CANNOT AFFORD TO PAY THEIR HOSPITAL BILLS"
|
Denials +
Recoupment =
Inflation +
Fraud or
Cost-Sharing?
Rx =
Compliant Denial & Appeals! |
|
Forbes.com: "Roughly one in seven Americans has
no health insurance. That hurts HCA Inc. (nyse:
HCA -
news
-
people), the largest U.S. hospital chain, which
last year wrote off $2.21 billion
of revenue because patients couldn't pay their
bills."
The American Hospital Association (AHA): "Hospitals today are faced with the challenge of managing their
limited resources, while continuing to deliver the highest standard of care.
According to health care experts, the cost of clinical
denials to individual healthcare organizations averages
$3.3 million
annually. However, many hospitals do not have the resources or the
expertise needed to avoid unpaid days at the end of admissions and lead the
denial-appeals processes."
Payments Go Under a Microscope (washingtonpost.com)
"MAMSI and CareFirst recoup overpayments to doctors by making
deductions from future reimbursements.
Doctors can appeal insurers' decisions.
But, in the end, they usually pay up, doctors and insurers agree."
Hospital Pricing and the Uninsured,
Glenn Melnick, Ph.D.,
"Price
Gouging"
(Subcommittee on Health
Hearing on the Uninsured,
U.S.
FILES COMPLAINT AGAINST NATIONAL ACCOUNTING FIRM UNDER FALSE CLAIMS ACT
(DOJ
Press Release) "January 5, 2004
- PHILADELPHIA –
United States Attorney Patrick L. Meehan announced today the filing of the
Government's
complaint against national accounting firm Ernst & Young.
According to the complaint, nine hospitals paid Ernst & Young for billing
advice – advice which later caused the submission of false claims to the
Medicare program."
USATODAY.com - Hospitals Sock Uninsured with Much Bigger Bills
GM to Report $60B in Future Health-Care Obligations
|
|
|
 |
Medical Fraud Every Day?
Appeal or Re-Bill After
Denial?
You Must APPEAL
No Re-Billing!!!
Claim Appeal or
Sentencing Appeal?
Your Choice |
|
Aetna:
Leading the Fight Against Health Care Fraud
[PDF]
View as HTML
"Thanks to this highly collaborative
relationship, we know how to identify fraud because we know
what to look for.
Medical Fraud
-
Unusual provider
billing practices.
Discrepancy between
the submitted diagnosis and the treatment.
Diagnoses or
treatments that are outside the practitioner’s scope of
practice.
Claims that are
resubmitted with coding changes to gain benefits.
Alterations on claim
submissions.
Pressure for quick
claim payment."
Payments Go Under a Microscope (washingtonpost.com)
January 12, 2004
"MAMSI and CareFirst
recoup overpayments to
doctors by making deductions from future reimbursements.
Doctors can appeal insurers'
decisions. But, in the end, they usually pay up, doctors
and insurers agree."
Employers Audit Workers' Health Claims (Wall Street
Journal via SFGate.com)
Excerpt: "Looking to bring down soaring
health-care costs anywhere they can, more employers are scouring
their health plans for fraud, abuse and simple mistakes by
employees or administrators.
.......The
number of requests for such audits jumped 50 percent last year,
Mr. Farley estimates."
Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association Announces New Strike
Force to Protect American Consumers from Fraud and Fight Rising
Costs (U.S.
Newswire, 4/19/2004)
"DETROIT, April 19 /U.S.
Newswire/ -- The Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association (BCBSA)
today announced a new Anti-Fraud Strike Force comprised of top
Blue Plan investigators that will work with the Federal Bureau
of Investigation (FBI) and other national, state and local law
enforcement agencies to fight major insurance fraud schemes that
rob consumers of millions of dollars annually. BCBSA President
and CEO Scott P. Serota announced the new initiative in a speech
to the Detroit Economic Club."
Clinton Township Firm Convicted of
Overbilling (Macomb
Daily)
"The case is somewhat
unusual in that a corporation was named as a criminal defendant
in the case,
but Kaiser said that is not unheard of since corporate law can
make a firm liable for criminal wrongdoing, and its principal
office holders in return are responsible for any judgments or
punishments the courts impose.
David Griem,
the defense attorney for Emergency Management who was also named
the principal to enter a guilty plea on its behalf,
also could not be reached for comment after the sentencing
hearing. In court, however, he turned over a check to the Blue
Cross insurance company officials in attendance and said the
company would pay the $5,000 court costs on time as well."
|
Health Care Fraud Report
Fiscal Year 1998

|
USDOJ: Deputy Attorney
General: Publications and Documents - - Health Care Fraud
Report Fiscal Year 1998
"On June
4, 1998, in the District of Maryland, Levindale Geriatric
Hospital paid $800,000 to resolve allegations it violated
the FCA by recoding and resubmitting
denied charges for room and board. After the claims for room
and board were denied by the Medicare Part A program,
Levindale recoded the claims as supplies, laboratory work
and other services, and submitted the claims for payment.
In addition to paying a substantial penalty under the FCA,
Levindale entered into a compliance agreement with HHS-OIG"
|
|
|
|
|
Happy or Sad 30th Birthday To ERISA?
(Copyright
© 2004
by
Jin Zhou, ERISAclaim.com)
Sept. 2, 2004
On Sept. 2, 1974,
exactly 30 years ago today, ERISA, The Employee Retirement
Income Security Act,
was signed into law by President Gerald R. Ford. The congressional intent in enacting ERISA was to
protect employees in pension and welfare plans, to provide
uniform federal protections in response to the failure of the
Studebaker Co. in December 1963, with thousands of long-service
employees cheated out off their promised pensions, and to
preempt any state laws when the employees pension and welfare
benefits were threatened. 30 years later, ERISA Failure in its
compliance and enforcement left thousands of retirees without
medical benefits, and resulted in a skyrocketing national healthcare expenditure explosion with 45 million uninsured and a possible national pension bailout.
ERISA Failure Syndrome
U.S. Healthcare Crisis
Trilogy
Jin Zhou Identifies "ERISA Failure" That Killed
U.S. Healthcare
"Failure of Imagination"
Again?
|
|
ERISA Celebrates 30th Anniversary As Trouble Brews For the Pension
Insurance Program (Spencer Benefits Reports)
Excerpt: "The seed for
ERISA was planted with the failure of the Studebaker Company in
December 1963, leaving thousands of long-service employees
without their promised pensions."
|
A
New Diagnosis & Prescription for
Our
Nation's Health-care Crisis
Contrary to
the popular belief, our nation's health-care crisis has been truly
and mainly caused by the
lack of understanding and
failing in compliance with
ERISA, the federal law regulating about
80% of
health-care claims or
60% of
health expenditures in the U. S. by both
insurance/benefits
industry and health-care providers for 28 years, through reckless
and
fraudulent as well as
revengeful, inflationary spiral
billings and
claim denials that
destroyed
or foreclosed the hope,
faith and
the Law
&
Order for our nation in health-care quality and
cost control, and the lack of meaningful and practical federal
administrative enforcement of ERISA claim regulations, because this
inflationary spiral skyrocketing increases in
managed
care claim and denial war behind
ERISA
shield between
health
insurers/ERISA plans and healthcare providers
have
overwhelmingly outnumbered increases in cost of living and national
gross domestic products, causing
annual
double-digit increases in
health
insurance premiums and
skyrocket health-care costs
($1.55
trillion
in 2002, 14.9% of the U.S GDP)
after
every managed care strategy and
model
failed to
contain or control health-care costs in long run
despite short-term savings, while entire country has devoted
more
and more money in
litigation,
legislation
and
noncompliant managed care campaign, which practically have
solved little or no problem.
In order to
resuscitate U.S. Healthcare/managed care from such a
critical
condition, the strategy and solution must to be a
common ground
acceptable to all parties involved, instead of hostile and contradictory
debate of punitive
damage therapy vs.
the uninsured coverage in
Congress. This
common ground for our national health-care crisis is the
ERISA
Claim Regulations, applicable and existing laws and regulations on
the book, originally designed by Congress in 1974 to
regulate
health-care claim dispute and to avoid fiduciary breach and
failures we are facing today.
A new practical and effective solution to
saving our
nation's health-care system is to implement
ERISA as
Congress intended by creating a new
occupation or profession, ERISA claim specialists and departments,
t0 bridge the gap FROM
medical billers and coders &
insurance claim processors TO lawyers for both health-care providers and
insurance companies/ERISA plans, and to educate everyone in
health-care and employee benefits system,
health-care
providers and their associations and leaders,
IPA's, MCO's,
health insurance, employee benefits TPA's
and legislators as well as
regulators to truly understand ERISA, and comply with
existing
ERISA's
claim procedures and benefits administration rules, to make practical
sense for health insurance delivered as
employee welfare benefits under
ERISA,
protecting participants and beneficiaries and safeguarding plan
assets through compliance of
ERISA
laws and regulations by everyone.
How do
we know this is the right diagnosis and prescription?
Plain and simple, imagine what
would happen if the U.S. healthcare superhighway transported
$1.55 trillion for 283 million Americans each year without an
understanding, without compliance by any
one and
without
the enforcement of any existing
laws and
regulations governing those
80% of
the
healthcare claims,
60% of the
healthcare expenditures and
163 million Americans under
ERISA?
The latest Harvard & RAND study for Congress and state legislative debate on Patients'
Bills of Rights, conducted by David Studdert and Carole Roan Gresenz,
study authors from the Harvard School of Public Health and RAND, funded
by federal government, Department Of Labor, and Agency for Health Care
Research and Quality, revealed that
"little is publicly known about such appeals system", and concluded
that "A
majority of preservice appeals disputed choice of
provider or contractual coverage issues, rather than medical necessity.
Medical necessity disputes proliferate not around life-saving treatments
but in areas of societal uncertainty about the legitimate boundaries of
insurance coverage. Greater transparency about the coverage status of
specific services, through more precise
contractual language and consumer education about benefits limitations,
may help to avoid a large proportion of disputes in managed care."
A
JAMA Editorial commenting this study further supported the
conclusion of this study and advanced the
right solutions
more precisely at
New
ERISA Claim Regulations: "Regulations
issued by the Clinton administration in 2000
were designed to infuse rigor into the appeals process maintained by
employer-sponsored health plans covered by the Employee Retirement
Income
Security Act (ERISA),10 which governs insurance arrangements
for more than 150 million workers and their family members. Whether
these rules will be vigorously enforced remains to be seen."
This valuable study has pointed out the direction but failed to provide
a turnkey practical solution.
ERISAclaim.com has provided this nation with a turnkey operational
solution with ERISA compliance, to educate
everyone on ERISA, coverage and
claim
procedures, to ensure "Bill Of Rights" for Patients, Providers, Plan
Sponsors and Insurers.
|
|
Survey: Americans More Worried About Healthcare Costs Than Terrorist
Attacks (The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation)
Excerpt: "We were
surprised to find in our latest tracking poll that more Americans are
worried about health care costs than about losing their job, paying
their rent or mortgage, losing money in the stock market, or being a
victim of a terrorist attack.
Nearly four in 10
Americans (38%) say they are very worried that the amount they pay for
health care services or health insurance will increase, and a similar
share (37%) is very worried that their income might not keep up with
rising prices over the next six months."
Problems and Priorities (pollingreport.com)
82% of Americans rank
healthcare among their top issues, according to
Gallup Poll.
|
|
HEALTH COSTS--The
Breaking Point (FORTUNE.com)
"Worker health costs
will rise a staggering 24% this year. Companies can no longer afford to
pick up the bill. The battle is here."
"Pipal said there is little recourse for disgruntled physicians and
their patients, because managed-care companies function under the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) of 1974, a federal law
with new provisions governing health care benefits."
Are All
Consultants Corrupt? (Fast Company)
Excerpt: "That's one possible conclusion in the wake of the
Enron scandal.
According to David Maister, who's been studying professional-services firms
for more than 20 years, it's time to clear the air."
Law Professor Looks at
Criminal Prosecution for HMO Treatment Denial (Prof.
John A. Humbach published by the Health Administration
Responsibility Project (harp.org))
Staying Out of Jail
Under ERISA's Bulked-Up Criminal Law Penalites (Attorneys
Russell D. Shurtz and Craig R. Pett)
Excerpt:
|
"Criminal Sanctions Under ERISA Section 501 |
| |
Maximum
Criminal
Fine (Individuals) |
Maximum
Jail
Time |
Maximum
Criminal
Fine (Companies) |
|
Before
Sarbanes-Oxley |
$5,000 |
One Year |
$100,000 |
|
After
Sarbanes-Oxley |
$100,000 |
Ten Years |
$500,000" |
"These are hefty increases. Few have focused on the
fact that these bolstered penalties apply not only to black-out
notices,
but also to
ERISA's other plain-vanilla reporting and disclosure requirements. The
term "criminal penalties" seems so out of place with mundane things
like SPDs, SARs, and other run-of-the-mill benefit plan documents."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Codified in Title 29 of the
Code of Federal Regulations:
Regulations
Selected links:
2520.102-3 Contents of summary plan description.
2560.503-1 Claims procedure. |
|
|
 |
|
ERISA &
Claim
|
|
|
 |
|
ERISA Laws/Rules
|
|
|
 |
|
ERISA in US CODE
|
|
|
 |
| |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Opinion: The Coming Crash in Health Care (Fortune.com)
"Thus it may come as a surprise to
learn that the managed-care industry is dying. Oops, did we spill the
beans so soon? Well, so be it. Managed care is on the way out."
|
 |
|
HIPPA Final
|
|
|
 |
|
|